I sold mine.
Yes they are a good scope, the first circa 1993/4. Not sure if the first were Jap and then to the Philippines later. Great field of view though at x5 isn't special. A quality 4x40 can be brighter, and they do struggle with poor light. The cross hair isn't that fine and they work great because they are fast to shoot with little faffing about. They are also not a lump. Well suited to air rifles at farmyard ranges.
They seem to hold their value really well and have quite a following.
I have a similar style Leupold with thick plex on my .357 and it is superior in nearly every way. I also have a B&L that now reparallaxed is brighter still and goes up to x8. So what I am saying is there are better scopes of this style/configuration but they are more money. The Simmons is a good scope. WTC, White Tail Classics were good mid to budget scopes in their day and well built when many budget scopes were getting a bit cheap (Tasco's in free fall). The glass does struggle when put up against higher cost scopes, and the eye box are average. The outside coating is a great look but mount marks easy to get (fix mounts once and then leave the mounts alone). Front parallax focus WTC's can lose zero as the build is not quite perfect; all the rest give sterling service.
I'm a fan, though don't have any at present. Perfect for most 1994 to 2010 period rifles.