You mention arthritic hands. You may want to consider a break barrel, rather than UL and .22
"corners should be round" Theo Evo .22/.177 - Meopta 6x42, DS huntsman classic .20 vortex razor LH 3-15x42 under supervised boingrati tuning by Tony L & Tinbum, HW77 forest green - Nikon prostaff 2-7x32 plex.
At 20yds it's got to be .22 and the pro sport is sooooo nice.
having had both guns i would say that the tx200 is a far better gun than the pro sport,and i even prefer the looks of the tx. pete
You can spend thousands and still miss a barn door or spend just enough and enjoy yourself. If you haven't got the talent to start with a million pound won't fix it. Whippet, Russell, a few bang sticks and a flat cap. http://www.smart-tech1st.co.uk
I did try to handle a Walther LGV but the shop only had a LGU in stock which I handed back fairly quickly as it didn't fit me at all and felt a couple of pounds lighter than a Bren gun I fired in the 70s.
Still,I would consider a break barrel but the Air Arms underlevers seem likely to be my choice.
Personally I love all the mentioned rifles, but to be honest I would recommend a Weihrauch HW95K. In .22 they are a joy to shoot, the rifle is not to heavy and being a break barrel easy to load but also very easy to cock. It is a great all round rifle suitable for target, pinking, and HFT.
Shooting Air Rifles is like being a pubic hair on a toilet seat.
Eventually someone comes a long and P's you off.
They usually have a PCP
Its all open to question but from the OP (which I think is not disimilar to my own situation) I'd favour .22 Cal.
And if shooting either a Prosport or a TX (I own three TX's) plus a good few other air rifles, I like .22 and i would concentrate on this caliber for all practical distances.
“Let us not dwell on the distance we have fallen short, let us dwell on the distance we have travelled" !
No, it's all down to pure physics and actual facts. If shooting at shorter distances there is no point in .177 (unless you are really tight) It is just there for people who try and shoot too far without the skill to accurately judge the range.
Trouble is the .177 users are still compensating in every aspect of their lives.
It is as good!
It does work!
I don't have a small willy!
Better to admit you walked through the wrong door than spend your life in the wrong room
both the TX and Pro sport are very capable rifles.
The only thing I'd add to the above comments are the fact that both rifles have a different balance. The TX is more nose heavy. This suits some but not others.
If you do plan to shoot targets at further ranges in the future or if you think you may wish to try to try FT / HFT I reckon .177 would be a better bet calibre wise.
Either calibre will dispatch any legal quarry with ease.
Both will be fiddly to load in .177. The breech loading cut out on both makes access a little tricky. The port on the HW97 is more accessible but the two you mentioned are a better "out of the box" rifle.
B.A.S.C. member
You can spend thousands and still miss a barn door or spend just enough and enjoy yourself. If you haven't got the talent to start with a million pound won't fix it. Whippet, Russell, a few bang sticks and a flat cap. http://www.smart-tech1st.co.uk