Results 1 to 13 of 13

Thread: Velocity v range queery

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    cambridge
    Posts
    919

    Velocity v range queery

    Hi,
    Has anyone got a link to a previous thread or a formula for calculating theoretical pellet velocity at different ranges using a known muzzle velocity & pellet style please?
    Thanks, Rod

  2. #2
    eyebull's Avatar
    eyebull is offline Even a stopped clock is right twice a day
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Borehamwood
    Posts
    6,769
    Use Chairgun, available on the Hawke website.
    Good deals with these members

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Shirland
    Posts
    513
    There is no such thing due to the complexity of the calculus. The nearest you can get will be the standard flat fire equations which will workish over short ranges for lower speeds but rely on a constant Cd. Particularly for .177 pellets and for longer ranges in any calibre the constant Cd assumption is not valid.
    As said earlier the simplest way is to use Chairgun.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    cambridge
    Posts
    919
    Thanks folks

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Cambridge UK
    Posts
    7,150
    There have been some real life results reported recently in the airgun magazines.
    Cheers, Phil

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Shirland
    Posts
    513
    Quote Originally Posted by Phil Russell View Post
    There have been some real life results reported recently in the airgun magazines.
    Cheers, Phil
    The trouble with real life results is that you do not know the conditions under which the real life results were obtained. For example, was it a hot day or a cold day, was the pressure high or low, was there a wind blowing and at what speed and in what direction? All the above can make a significant difference to the results and make comparisons between tests meaningless unless corrections are applied and full analysis carried out, which brings us back to trajectory modelling which is the only way to rigidly control the conditions and make valid comparisons.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Warrington
    Posts
    518
    Giles on the AGGS, did a pellet caliber x velocity test which gave some very surprising and interesting results .
    Worth a watch.
    Peace through superior fire power!

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    doncaster
    Posts
    2,468
    Quote Originally Posted by ballisticboy View Post
    There is no such thing due to the complexity of the calculus. The nearest you can get will be the standard flat fire equations which will workish over short ranges for lower speeds but rely on a constant Cd. Particularly for .177 pellets and for longer ranges in any calibre the constant Cd assumption is not valid.
    As said earlier the simplest way is to use Chairgun.
    what ballistic boy said

    there are a million and one things that can affect pellet velocity in flight
    wind speed
    wind direction
    temperature
    humidity
    angle of shot (shooting up or down hill)
    (these are just the common ones)
    "Men occasionally stumble on the truth, but most of them pick themselves up and hurry off as if nothing had happened" Winston Churchill
    http://planetairgun.com/index.php

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Exeter
    Posts
    36,824
    Quote Originally Posted by trajectory View Post
    Hi,
    Has anyone got a link to a previous thread or a formula for calculating theoretical pellet velocity at different ranges using a known muzzle velocity & pellet style please?
    Thanks, Rod
    How about just placing a chrono at range x & shooting through it

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    yeovil
    Posts
    1,344
    Quote Originally Posted by angrybear View Post
    How about just placing a chrono at range x & shooting through it
    Only reliable calculation i got from shooting through my chrony was a depleted bank balance!

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    cambridge
    Posts
    919
    Ballistics are indeed complex & dependant on many factors. In terms of practical testing with a chronograph outside it's just too cold, wet,& windy at the moment so the theoretical route seemed a possible alternative in the meantime, even if it might not provide an absolute answer.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Exeter
    Posts
    36,824
    Quote Originally Posted by nimrod177 View Post
    Only reliable calculation i got from shooting through my chrony was a depleted bank balance!
    Yes, I know that feeling but learned the lesson "fit a shield if using down range"

    OP, chairgun will get you "ballpark" figures.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Alicante, Birmingham and sometimes Munich
    Posts
    109
    Quote Originally Posted by angrybear View Post
    Yes, I know that feeling but learned the lesson "fit a shield if using down range"

    OP, chairgun will get you "ballpark" figures.
    Albeit a very small ballpark if you enter accurate data.

    George

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •