Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 33

Thread: HW98, or HW77 laminate?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Sep 2016
    Location
    Oxfordshire
    Posts
    233

    HW98, or HW77 laminate?

    What do folk reckon? What would you choose?

    As the piston seal diameter is the same for both i assume the behaviour would be much the same?
    The purpose for this rifle will be target and plinking orientated.

    I have a 95 and know the 98 has the same guts, however i like the stock and barrel weight of the 98.

    I'm between the 2...

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Bexhill-On-Sea
    Posts
    5,455
    Quote Originally Posted by CuppaT View Post
    What do folk reckon? What would you choose?

    As the piston seal diameter is the same for both i assume the behaviour would be much the same?
    The purpose for this rifle will be target and plinking orientated.

    I have a 95 and know the 98 has the same guts, however i like the stock and barrel weight of the 98.

    I'm between the 2...
    77 - K Special Edition no comparison !
    Looking for TO-6 Trigger unit unmessed with or T0-6 kit for 34

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 2016
    Location
    Oxfordshire
    Posts
    233
    How do you come to that decision?

  4. #4
    Murphy is offline Cooee! Chase me you naughty boys!
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Wigan
    Posts
    22,424
    Both to be safe.
    Master Debater

  5. #5
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Birmingham England
    Posts
    571
    On its own the similarity on the bore size means very little.

    Other than both being HW's with the same trigger, the handling and shooting characteristics of the rifles differ significantly : the weights are different, the balance is different, loading is different etc.

    Given that you've already got a 95, I would go with the 77 by way of variation, but to be honest I'd handle both side by side first if you can - If you've not already shot a 77/97 then you really need to shoot one so you can decide for yourself: break barrel vs underlever is a bit like a front wheel drive car vs a rear wheel drive car - they both do the same basic job but they feel very different in the way they do it.
    Last edited by Taz72; 19-02-2018 at 08:30 AM. Reason: Grammar

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    worthing
    Posts
    3,333
    While I really like the laminate thing, I'd go with the 98 because I much prefer breakers...

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Retford, Notts
    Posts
    37,287
    Quote Originally Posted by Taz72 View Post
    On its own the similarity on the bore size means very little.

    Other than both being HW's with the same trigger, the the handling and shooting characteristics of the rifles differ significantly : the weights are different, the balance is different, loading is different etc.

    Given that you've already got a 95, I would go with the 77 by way of variation, but to be honest I'd handle both side by side first if you can - If you've not already shot a 77/97 then you really need to shoot one so you can decide for yourself: break barrel vs underlever is a bit like a front wheel drive car vs a rear wheel drive car - they both do the same basic job but they feel very different in the way they do it.

    This ^ ^ ^
    THE BOINGER BASH AT QUIGLEY HOLLOW. MAKING GREAT MEMORIES SINCE 15th JUNE, 2013.
    NEXT EVENT :- May 17/18, 2025.........BOING!!

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    middlesbrough
    Posts
    9,062
    77 for the above reasons the forest green stock is fxxxxxg cool
    LOOKING FOR A BSA ULTRA IN .177 and .25

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Mar 2015
    Location
    Swindon
    Posts
    5,324
    It'd be the 77 for me - I prefer underlevers and, I'm a bit of a magpie for those laminate stocks.

    All of the above.

  10. #10
    flyingfish's Avatar
    flyingfish is offline I may only have 5 but I have the best 5
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Location
    Luton
    Posts
    3,275
    98 for me. The adjustable stock makes a huge difference
    Pete
    I travel alone

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Location
    Eastbourne
    Posts
    2,226
    I have both of those and they are indeed completely different to use. One thing I love about the 77 is the open sights for plinking. If I had to get rid of one or the other I would be torn but reckon I would keep the 77

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Sep 2016
    Location
    Oxfordshire
    Posts
    233
    Concernng BB vs UL... The awkward loading is one reason i sold my last UL. Uuummmm
    Thanks for replies

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Preston
    Posts
    3,278
    77 for me, like the shape and look of the laminate stock, would enjoy the open sight option too. Loading not a problem unless you fit a gert stupid scope on it. Quality rather than quantity, no 30mm tubes, just not required imo. Atb Max
    Plinkerer and Tinkerer

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    wakefield
    Posts
    1,923

    77

    I'd go with the hw77 but it's easy for me as I've got a bigtoe short stroke 98 already the hw77 is a very nice looking rifle

  15. #15
    Blackrider's Avatar
    Blackrider is offline It don't mean a thing, if it ain't got a Spring
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Perthshire the Heart of Scotland !
    Posts
    9,743
    The Weihrauch site is showing the Special Edition 77 in a "brown camo laminated stock" which is the new ambi version. I personally prefer the original lamo stock which I think was named "Autumn" and was a available for a very short time.
    However, as a southpaw the newer ambi stock would be welcome !
    “Let us not dwell on the distance we have fallen short, let us dwell on the distance we have travelled" !

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •