I have both and both went back to HC , but now both are great . HW110 is quieter than the 100 as well
I have a CS500 stock on the HW100k which makes it far better in balance ,also A&M cylinder
As the title really.
I’ve had a HW100kt previously, but not the laminate version. I know how to fiddle with them and like them a lot.
The weight and low shot count puts me off slightly.
The HW110 looks a great gun, shot count is up, it’s lighter, etc etc, but imo the stock is terrible so I’d have one made for it.
I know the 110 had a few issues when they came out. Have these been resolved?
Really torn on what to do.
Regards,
Rhys
Theoben TTR1 .177, Steven B Blue/Grey Laminate Stock, Nutshot Mod, Hawke Sidewinder 10x42 Tac IR
Daystate Pulsar. 177, Donny FL Sumo Mod, Pard NV008LRF
I have both and both went back to HC , but now both are great . HW110 is quieter than the 100 as well
I have a CS500 stock on the HW100k which makes it far better in balance ,also A&M cylinder
I have the HW 100 T in .20 with A&M cylinder and Cs 700 stock. 140 full power shots combined with laser like accuracy ( shot gun shells at 100 yards) and can fine tune and maintain on my dining room table with nothing more than a set of Allen keys.
Id look into a Cs stock or similar. The more adjustability the better.
I already know a man who can for the stock.
He made the one I have on my ttr. A very talented guy!
It’s just the action I need to decide if the hw110 action has more benefits than the hw100?
This is a tough one
Theoben TTR1 .177, Steven B Blue/Grey Laminate Stock, Nutshot Mod, Hawke Sidewinder 10x42 Tac IR
Daystate Pulsar. 177, Donny FL Sumo Mod, Pard NV008LRF
I have the HW 100 T in .20 with A&M cylinder and Cs 700 stock. 140 full power shots combined with laser like accuracy ( shot gun shells at 100 yards) and can fine tune and maintain on my dining room table with nothing more than a set of Allen keys.
Id look into a Cs stock or similar. The more adjustability the better.