Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 28

Thread: Filler Question.

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Worthing
    Posts
    3,380

    Filler Question.

    Conventional wisdom suggests that we should use a filler in our muzzle loading revolver loads for two reasons.

    1. To eliminate an air gap in the chamber which might result in an inconsistent burn rate.

    2. To place the projectile closer to the breech thus allowing it to engage the rifling without a jump if it were to be seated deeper within the chamber.

    My question takes us back to the time before the breech loading handgun ban in 1995 when smokeless powder was the most common propellant. Back then, the standard .38 Special revolver target load was around 2.8 grains of Bullseye behind a 148 grain Wadcutter lead bullet. The tiny amount of powder would have left a huge air gap in the .38 Special cartridge case and the Wadcutter bullet itself would have been completely seated within the case resulting in quite a big jump before the bullet entered the rifling. So, why is the use of a filler considered essential when using black powder loads, but doesn't seem to be necessary when using smokeless powder ?

    Regards
    Brian

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Huntingdon
    Posts
    9,253
    Quote Originally Posted by Abasmajor View Post
    Conventional wisdom suggests that we should use a filler in our muzzle loading revolver loads for two reasons.

    1. To eliminate an air gap in the chamber which might result in an inconsistent burn rate.

    2. To place the projectile closer to the breech thus allowing it to engage the rifling without a jump if it were to be seated deeper within the chamber.

    My question takes us back to the time before the breech loading handgun ban in 1995 when smokeless powder was the most common propellant. Back then, the standard .38 Special revolver target load was around 2.8 grains of Bullseye behind a 148 grain Wadcutter lead bullet. The tiny amount of powder would have left a huge air gap in the .38 Special cartridge case and the Wadcutter bullet itself would have been completely seated within the case resulting in quite a big jump before the bullet entered the rifling. So, why is the use of a filler considered essential when using black powder loads, but doesn't seem to be necessary when using smokeless powder ?

    Regards
    Brian
    It's because BP is an explosive compound, and the air contained in the space would enable an 'explosive front' to generate, causing, mostly, massive damage in a confined space such as bulging of a chamber, or bulging/ringing of an barrel - or at it worst, a burst barrel.

    By contrast, nitro propellant compounds do not detonate, but burn, albeit quickly, as far as WE are concerned, but slowly as far a actual physics are concerned.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Worthing
    Posts
    3,380
    Quote Originally Posted by tacfoley View Post
    It's because BP is an explosive compound, and the air contained in the space would enable an 'explosive front' to generate, causing, mostly, massive damage in a confined space such as bulging of a chamber, or bulging/ringing of an barrel - or at it worst, a burst barrel.

    By contrast, nitro propellant compounds do not detonate, but burn, albeit quickly, as far as WE are concerned, but slowly as far a actual physics are concerned.
    Thanks for the reply. I can understand the possibility of an explosive compound detonating in a contained air environment causing a problem, but wondered if the same situation would arise when using a black powder substitute such as Pyrodex or 777 which are classed as propellants rather than explosive compounds.

    Do you believe in practice that not seating the projectile really close to the rifling would have a detrimental effect on accuracy ?

    Brian

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    leeds, west yorkshire
    Posts
    13,023
    greener and others say an air gap in brass cased ammo is possible if 80% of capacity is used.
    i know a few shooters who use no filler at all just 85 gn of bp in a .577 / 450 with usual wads etc in the neck.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Manchester
    Posts
    8,331
    I don't use a filler in my repro revolver. I use 22 grains of fine blackpowder and it is accurate enough at 25 yards even though the ball is away from the rifling.
    If I fill the chamber up with powder so the ball sits close to the rifling the accuracy is abysmal.

    I don't know if a filler improves accuracy.I find that lower charges are better in most revolvers.

    It may be that the ball has chance to stabilise at short range with the lower charge.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Chelmsford
    Posts
    801
    I dont use anything other than blackpowder to fill chambers in my Colt Walker just 55 grains of black powder a .44 wonder wad and a .457 ball.
    In my flintlock .520 all steel Scottish pistol I use 40 grains of black powder a 10 thou lubricated patch and a .500 ball.
    Most satifactory and enjoyable to use.
    If you buy a replica at least use an original load in it.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Daventry. Northants.
    Posts
    3,534
    Quote Originally Posted by Abasmajor View Post
    Conventional wisdom suggests that we should use a filler in our muzzle loading revolver loads for two reasons.

    1. To eliminate an air gap in the chamber which might result in an inconsistent burn rate.

    2. To place the projectile closer to the breech thus allowing it to engage the rifling without a jump if it were to be seated deeper within the chamber.

    My question takes us back to the time before the breech loading handgun ban in 1995 when smokeless powder was the most common propellant. Back then, the standard .38 Special revolver target load was around 2.8 grains of Bullseye behind a 148 grain Wadcutter lead bullet. The tiny amount of powder would have left a huge air gap in the .38 Special cartridge case and the Wadcutter bullet itself would have been completely seated within the case resulting in quite a big jump before the bullet entered the rifling. So, why is the use of a filler considered essential when using black powder loads, but doesn't seem to be necessary when using smokeless powder ?

    Regards
    Brian
    Brian, no matter where you position your bullet in the chamber it still has to jump the gap between the cylinder and the forcing cone on the start of the breech of the barrel, loading it as close to the chamber mouth as you can wont make any difference to loading it half way down.

    TB.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Huntingdon
    Posts
    9,253
    All the manufacturers of BP arms, and ALL the loading books, and everybody I've ever spoken to about the subject over the last fifty something years say exactly the same thing, as, indeed, all the demonstrators on YouTube, and everybody I've had contact with on muzzleloadingforum.com, many of whom are professional builders of muzzle loading firearms, often costing into five figures.

    When loading ANY BP arm, even using substitutes, you leave an airgap at your own risk, IOW, DON'T DO IT. Short-loading any BP arm is fraught with danger, and that ball or bullet MUST be firmly seated on the charge.

    You can argue and ask what if until the cows come home, but if you wish to carry out your own experiments into what happens if you don't, you are on your own. The list of bulged and/or burst barrels and missing body parts stretches from here to there and back again.

    I've no more to add to that.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Ashford
    Posts
    1,222
    You cannot really compare BP & substitutes to smokeless powder.
    The firearms designed to use smokeless are far far stronger than any of the BR firearms on the market. Smokeless burns differently with a lower initial spike but a more prolonged pressure build up resulting in a higher overall chamber pressure.

    You only need to look on YouTube and you'll find plenty of examples of people in the US showing what happens when you load a BP firearm with smokeless. It's mortally dangerous.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q_XNWeMqCT0

    By the sound of the earlier replies the only people not using a filler ram the ball all the way onto the power anyway, regardless of the charge size.

    And I'm with Tac 100%, Never ever load with an air gap for BP. I dont know how the physics of substitutes like Pyrodex & 777 work, but BP deflagrates (burns bloody fast) at a constant rate with oxygen present.
    The air trapped in-between the grains is sufficient for the powder burn to build pressure to propel the projectile - However, if given more air the initial burn will last longer, this is where the term pressure spike comes from. BP builds more pressure than smokeless initially, but due to lack of air the pressure is only for a brief instant then the burn slows. The danger with the air gap is it provides enough air for the initial pressure spike to significantly increase to the point the firearm fails.

    Edit - Good article here on longer air gaps cause by short loading the projectile for those who shoot long arms.
    http://www.brimstonepistoleros.com/articles/squib.html

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Manchester
    Posts
    8,331
    Quote Originally Posted by Solvo View Post
    You cannot really compare BP & substitutes to smokeless powder.
    The firearms designed to use smokeless are far far stronger than any of the BR firearms on the market. Smokeless burns differently with a lower initial spike but a more prolonged pressure build up resulting in a higher overall chamber pressure.

    You only need to look on YouTube and you'll find plenty of examples of people in the US showing what happens when you load a BP firearm with smokeless. It's mortally dangerous.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q_XNWeMqCT0

    By the sound of the earlier replies the only people not using a filler ram the ball all the way onto the power anyway, regardless of the charge size.

    And I'm with Tac 100%, Never ever load with an air gap for BP. I dont know how the physics of substitutes like Pyrodex & 777 work, but BP deflagrates (burns bloody fast) at a constant rate with oxygen present.
    The air trapped in-between the grains is sufficient for the powder burn to build pressure to propel the projectile - However, if given more air the initial burn will last longer, this is where the term pressure spike comes from. BP builds more pressure than smokeless initially, but due to lack of air the pressure is only for a brief instant then the burn slows. The danger with the air gap is it provides enough air for the initial pressure spike to significantly increase to the point the firearm fails.

    Edit - Good article here on longer air gaps cause by short loading the projectile for those who shoot long arms.
    http://www.brimstonepistoleros.com/articles/squib.html
    Its the saltpetre (Potassium Nitrate) that provides the oxygen for blackpowder to burn.
    Blackpowder is an explosive. It detonates and will do this outside a gun chamber.
    If there is an air gap the powder gases start to expand. If they hit a solid such as a ball the pressure peaks at that point which causes the gun to burst. Without an air gap there is a progressive expansion of the gases that push the projectile out.

    The peak pressure hitting a solid or obstruction also happens with smokeless. Several years ago there was what was termed a "Rash of Pimples" appearing on shotgun barrels.
    It was eventually discovered that clay shooters who used the first barrel and did not fire the second barrel for a while was causing the crimp to weaken, due to the recoil, and allow the odd pellet to drop into the bore.
    When they did fire the second barrel the charge hitting the loose pellet in the barrel caused the pressure to peak momentarily at that point and cause a tiny pellet sized bulge on the bottom of the barrel.
    A larger obstruction would cause the pressure to peak higher and bulge or burst the barrel.

  11. #11
    Turnup's Avatar
    Turnup is offline Dialling code‎: ‎01344
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Crowthorne
    Posts
    5,512
    Quote Originally Posted by enfield2band View Post
    Its the saltpetre (Potassium Nitrate) that provides the oxygen for blackpowder to burn.
    Blackpowder is an explosive. It detonates and will do this outside a gun chamber.
    If there is an air gap the powder gases start to expand. If they hit a solid such as a ball the pressure peaks at that point which causes the gun to burst. Without an air gap there is a progressive expansion of the gases that push the projectile out.

    The peak pressure hitting a solid or obstruction also happens with smokeless. Several years ago there was what was termed a "Rash of Pimples" appearing on shotgun barrels.
    It was eventually discovered that clay shooters who used the first barrel and did not fire the second barrel for a while was causing the crimp to weaken, due to the recoil, and allow the odd pellet to drop into the bore.
    When they did fire the second barrel the charge hitting the loose pellet in the barrel caused the pressure to peak momentarily at that point and cause a tiny pellet sized bulge on the bottom of the barrel.
    A larger obstruction would cause the pressure to peak higher and bulge or burst the barrel.

    Agree with this mostly. Air in a BP load plays no part in the chemical reaction - BP has all the oxygen it needs already chemically bound in the Potassium Nitrate (which is released when heated and there is exactly enough oxygen to combine with the Carbon and Sulphur completely). The presence of an air gap changes the propagation of the deflagration reaction within the powder in unpredictable ways because the BP grains are not initially constrained to remain in one place. Sometimes you get away with it (I have fired a BP revolver where I had omitted the filler so the BP was loose - competition event and had no time to sort it - no harm done this time) and sometimes you don't. It does seem to be more of an issue with pistols than revolvers but this is not science.

    Disagree on BP detonation. Detonation is defined as a deflagration (burning) reaction which proceeds through the deflagrating material supersonically. There is no known way to detonate smokeless. There is some suspicion that it is just about possible to detonate BP, but if it occurs at all it requires extreme conditions of a kind not encountered in firearms and even then the result is deflagration which is only marginally supersonic. Note that here I an referring to the speed of propagation of the reaction in relation to the speed of sound in the medium (in this case BP), and this is neither related to the speed of sound in air or the speed of the resulting projectile or combustion gasses.

    BP requires some form of containment to produce a bang when ignited - free burning rate is not fast enough to go bang. A large amount of BP in a loose pile can self confine but it takes about a pound of the stuff to produce a bang rather than a "wuff". Small confinement (such as loose in an open ended cylinder) can produce a bang with much less material.

    For these reasons BP is classed as a low explosive.

    High explosives detonate well supersonically and produce characteristic shattering in metals rather than bending/stretching/tearing such as caused simply by overpressure.

    It is my experience that:

    a) reduced loads in revolvers can increase accuracy = this is analogous to the holy grail sweet spot Mv sought by many target shooters (air, rifle, and pistol/revolver).

    b) seating the ball close to the chamber mouth is most likely to give the best results.

    c) I do believe that there is also a sweet spot (or possible more than one) when seating the ball below the chamber mouth, at least in my ROA, but with no filler there are two variables (adjusting a BP only load varies seating depth and the resulting Mv) so it is difficult to experiment with any good control
    True freedom includes the freedom to make mistakes or do foolish things and bear the consequences.
    TANSTAAFL

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Worthing
    Posts
    3,380
    Quote Originally Posted by Turnup View Post
    Agree with this mostly. Air in a BP load plays no part in the chemical reaction - BP has all the oxygen it needs already chemically bound in the Potassium Nitrate (which is released when heated and there is exactly enough oxygen to combine with the Carbon and Sulphur completely). The presence of an air gap changes the propagation of the deflagration reaction within the powder in unpredictable ways because the BP grains are not initially constrained to remain in one place. Sometimes you get away with it (I have fired a BP revolver where I had omitted the filler so the BP was loose - competition event and had no time to sort it - no harm done this time) and sometimes you don't. It does seem to be more of an issue with pistols than revolvers but this is not science.

    Disagree on BP detonation. Detonation is defined as a deflagration (burning) reaction which proceeds through the deflagrating material supersonically. There is no known way to detonate smokeless. There is some suspicion that it is just about possible to detonate BP, but if it occurs at all it requires extreme conditions of a kind not encountered in firearms and even then the result is deflagration which is only marginally supersonic. Note that here I an referring to the speed of propagation of the reaction in relation to the speed of sound in the medium (in this case BP), and this is neither related to the speed of sound in air or the speed of the resulting projectile or combustion gasses.

    BP requires some form of containment to produce a bang when ignited - free burning rate is not fast enough to go bang. A large amount of BP in a loose pile can self confine but it takes about a pound of the stuff to produce a bang rather than a "wuff". Small confinement (such as loose in an open ended cylinder) can produce a bang with much less material.

    For these reasons BP is classed as a low explosive.

    High explosives detonate well supersonically and produce characteristic shattering in metals rather than bending/stretching/tearing such as caused simply by overpressure.

    It is my experience that:

    a) reduced loads in revolvers can increase accuracy = this is analogous to the holy grail sweet spot Mv sought by many target shooters (air, rifle, and pistol/revolver).

    b) seating the ball close to the chamber mouth is most likely to give the best results.

    c) I do believe that there is also a sweet spot (or possible more than one) when seating the ball below the chamber mouth, at least in my ROA, but with no filler there are two variables (adjusting a BP only load varies seating depth and the resulting Mv) so it is difficult to experiment with any good control
    Hello,

    Thanks for the comprehensive explanations from both yourself and others who have kindly contributed to this thread and helped me gain a better understanding of the reasons for using filler in BP revolver loads.

    I'm still not convinced about the necessity of seating the ball close to the chamber mouth though because as stated in the original post, the recommended precision target load for nitro revolvers before the 1995 breech loading pistol ban used a 148 grn Wadcutter bullet necessarily seated a long way from entry to the breech necessitating quite a big jump before engaging the barrel rifling.

    Brian

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    leeds, west yorkshire
    Posts
    13,023
    i dont reload bp this way but a few lads i know from another forum do..
    basically they load martini henrys with 85gns of bp with no filler other than the grease cookies and cards in the neck.
    they say mr greener and others said leaving up to 20% air space in a cartridge was acceptable with no issues.
    these are not my words but others

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Manchester
    Posts
    8,331
    Quote Originally Posted by Turnup View Post
    Agree with this mostly. Air in a BP load plays no part in the chemical reaction - BP has all the oxygen it needs already chemically bound in the Potassium Nitrate (which is released when heated and there is exactly enough oxygen to combine with the Carbon and Sulphur completely). The presence of an air gap changes the propagation of the deflagration reaction within the powder in unpredictable ways because the BP grains are not initially constrained to remain in one place. Sometimes you get away with it (I have fired a BP revolver where I had omitted the filler so the BP was loose - competition event and had no time to sort it - no harm done this time) and sometimes you don't. It does seem to be more of an issue with pistols than revolvers but this is not science.

    Disagree on BP detonation. Detonation is defined as a deflagration (burning) reaction which proceeds through the deflagrating material supersonically. There is no known way to detonate smokeless. There is some suspicion that it is just about possible to detonate BP, but if it occurs at all it requires extreme conditions of a kind not encountered in firearms and even then the result is deflagration which is only marginally supersonic. Note that here I an referring to the speed of propagation of the reaction in relation to the speed of sound in the medium (in this case BP), and this is neither related to the speed of sound in air or the speed of the resulting projectile or combustion gasses.

    BP requires some form of containment to produce a bang when ignited - free burning rate is not fast enough to go bang. A large amount of BP in a loose pile can self confine but it takes about a pound of the stuff to produce a bang rather than a "wuff". Small confinement (such as loose in an open ended cylinder) can produce a bang with much less material.

    For these reasons BP is classed as a low explosive.

    High explosives detonate well supersonically and produce characteristic shattering in metals rather than bending/stretching/tearing such as caused simply by overpressure.

    It is my experience that:

    a) reduced loads in revolvers can increase accuracy = this is analogous to the holy grail sweet spot Mv sought by many target shooters (air, rifle, and pistol/revolver).

    b) seating the ball close to the chamber mouth is most likely to give the best results.

    c) I do believe that there is also a sweet spot (or possible more than one) when seating the ball below the chamber mouth, at least in my ROA, but with no filler there are two variables (adjusting a BP only load varies seating depth and the resulting Mv) so it is difficult to experiment with any good control
    I don't disagree with what you are saying. I think we are looking at this differently.

    I have read somewhere that the detonation velocity of blackpowder is about 950fps. Thus explosives are,as far as I am aware, determined by their detonation velocity. SEMTEX has a detontaion velocity of 5 mile per second, which is why I used the term detonation. Blackpowder changes from a solid to a gas when ignited even when unconfined. As you know smokeless does not, it burns very rapidly.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Huntingdon
    Posts
    9,253
    Quote Originally Posted by loiner1965 View Post
    i dont reload bp this way but a few lads i know from another forum do..
    basically they load martini henrys with 85gns of bp with no filler other than the grease cookies and cards in the neck.
    they say mr greener and others said leaving up to 20% air space in a cartridge was acceptable with no issues.
    these are not my words but others
    Please go right ahead and try it out for us.

    We are eager to see your results.

    BTW, loading 85gr AND grease cookies in a .577-450 doesn't actually leave ANY airspace, in my experience, at least. YMMD.

    20% air gap? Might be OK. But basically the practice of leaving a LARGE airspace between a bullet/ball and load WILL result in damage to a BP firearm, ranging from mild ringing to catastrophic failure of the barrel at just about the point where your hand is holding it. Did you even look at the CVA YouTube movie?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •