Results 1 to 11 of 11

Thread: Correct ball mould size for .36 cal?

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    King's Lynn
    Posts
    1,898
    Thanks for all the replies.

    Yes, I know the issue you mean with the R&S preferring something bigger. The 1858 Remington is OK with the .451s though.
    Yes but apart from that, Mrs Lincoln, what did you think of the performance?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Warfield, Berkshire U.K.
    Posts
    4,501
    Quote Originally Posted by Mousemann View Post
    Thanks for all the replies.



    Yes, I know the issue you mean with the R&S preferring something bigger. The 1858 Remington is OK with the .451s though.
    Hi Mousemann

    My 1858 Pietta Remington 44 Stainless - likes 457 ..

    I was using smaller balls (451) - as it was a struggle to get them in - so I did not dare try bigger - then it turned out that the lead I was casting from was not soft lead - but had a little antimony in.

    Changed to soft lead - 457 goes in beautifully with a nice lead ring cut - which means more flat on the rifling = better groups !!!

    My grouping improved as soon as I moved to 457

    Wish you were closer - you could try mine gladly !


    Oh - just realised = 1000 posts !! where did they all come from !!

    Cheers

    Roy

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    King's Lynn
    Posts
    1,898
    Thanks for that, Roy and congratulations on your 1,000th post!

    The lead I've got is all pure, but I will closely look at the fit next time I fire some. It's handy to know about the .457 being best for that model.
    Yes but apart from that, Mrs Lincoln, what did you think of the performance?

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Warfield, Berkshire U.K.
    Posts
    4,501
    PM Sent

    Roy

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •