Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: Production numbers v calibre in older springers

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Location
    Wooster
    Posts
    3,532
    Quote Originally Posted by Geezer View Post
    Thanks, thegreg.

    Ditto here with the niche calibres. I do not gamble, but if I did, I would wager that absolutely no one buys a .20” or .25” as a first gun. They are things that only established enthusiasts buy.

    As evidence of which, I have three .20” guns. And more than one tin of .25” pellets, bought just in case I buy a .25”.
    Unless you in the US. A huge number of American Airgunners bought their first Airgun from Sheridan in 20 cal. They were the class act of US production from the 1950s-70s. Even now on my US forums there are those that have known no other gun? The love of these now vintage guns runs pretty deep. Crosman who bought Benjamin-Sheridan ended the 20 cal in 2013.
    Last edited by 45flint; 21-09-2018 at 06:20 AM.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Worcester
    Posts
    22,211
    In 1984 I ran a reader survey in SAR magazine, and one of the questions was which calibres people used.

    95% replied .22", suggesting just one in twenty of the rifles sold at the time were .177".

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Bruton
    Posts
    6,595
    Quote Originally Posted by 45flint View Post
    Unless you in the US.
    Of course. I should have said “in the U.K.”. But not now, though there must be some US first-timers going for the hyper-power .25”s?

    Quote Originally Posted by BTDT View Post
    In 1984 I ran a reader survey in SAR magazine, and one of the questions was which calibres people used.

    95% replied .22", suggesting just one in twenty of the rifles sold at the time were .177".
    I think I remember it!

    Of course, your readership was probably slanted toward the more serious pest controller, so the survey was less likely to be taken by 10M shooters and backyard plinkers with low-mid price low-mid power rifles.

    But, as I said above, no doubt that in the U.K., .22” was seen as “best” by huge numbers of buyers, many of whom (eg plinkers with “ASI Snipers” or Relum break-barrels) would have been as well served at lower ammunition cost by .177”s. Back then, a .22” in anything had a cachet out of proportion to its utility.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Location
    Chester
    Posts
    5,486
    Quote Originally Posted by BTDT View Post
    In 1984 I ran a reader survey in SAR magazine, and one of the questions was which calibres people used.

    95% replied .22", suggesting just one in twenty of the rifles sold at the time were .177".
    A guy in our club used to mention the same ratio,he may well of been quoting your survey figures.

    I wonder to what extent that figure has currently reversed?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •