Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: Life expectancy

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Location
    Eastbourne
    Posts
    2,132
    Quote Originally Posted by where's it gone View Post
    What would be the operational life expectancy of a today's co2 pistol ? I mean if you bought a brand new, never had a co2 used, come to think of that, neither seal lube used either, stored in original box and put away in a daily used house, would the pistol be useable in years to come or are today's offerings throw it away type ?
    Just wondering.
    I think theres definitely some dependency on the initial price point. The Baikal Makarov pistols are extremely well made using a large percentage of "real" parts and seem pretty indestructable. Whereas cheaper pistols that are comprised of a lot of di-cast parts will definitley fail in time. My Walther CP99 from years ago has done pretty well all things considered but it is getting tired these days.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Sheffield
    Posts
    2,466
    I have seen ancient CO2 guns working well (usually Crosman and Daisy), but I have seen many many relatively new ones leaking like a sieve.
    As said above quality counts, but physics being what it is eventually the seals will fail and some of these modern blowback semi auto things are just waiting to fail IMO.
    You can confidently buy a pre-war spring air pistol, I wouldn't be confident buying a second hand CO2 gun of any age unless it said "2240" on the side of it.
    Treat them as disposable - not least because the market for these guns is so fast moving that the chances of buying replacement parts a few years later are going to be slim.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jun 2000
    Location
    Basingstoke, U.K.
    Posts
    6,762
    Quote Originally Posted by MikeHW45 View Post
    I think theres definitely some dependency on the initial price point. The Baikal Makarov pistols are extremely well made using a large percentage of "real" parts and seem pretty indestructable. Whereas cheaper pistols that are comprised of a lot of di-cast parts will definitley fail in time. My Walther CP99 from years ago has done pretty well all things considered but it is getting tired these days.
    Yes, agreed about the Baikal Makarov. The mechanism is made of firearms quality parts and the pistol only needs the odd reseal if it sees heavy use.

    It would be interesting to see a 'pot metal' replica tested to destruction.

    John
    Currently looking for Baikal Makarov pistols with the following prefixes to the serial number: 98, T01, T09, T21, T22
    Prefer boxed or cased but will consider loose examples too.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Dec 2023
    Location
    Walden
    Posts
    57

    Topic cotinued . . . .

    I think my Crosmans like the MK 1 & 2 will be around another 60 years and functioning just fine. Topic is interesting. I am not fond of the plastic co2 air pistol very few co2 are built to last.

    Everyones opinion is different about new co2 air pistols being unworthy of resealing efforts in the future.

    Most see the rubbish bin not the repair bench in my home.


    Randall

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •