Results 1 to 15 of 15

Thread: RS powders, anybody?

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Fishtoft
    Posts
    1,398
    I have been using RS60 in my 260 for about a year now. I find it a clean powder, meters well and provides good velocities.
    RS60 is a high energy powder and therefore burns hot. I understand it is the same as RL17 and QuickLOAD shows them as being identical.
    To destroy a people, you must first sever their roots. Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Huntingdon
    Posts
    9,253
    Thanks, Gentlemen.

    tac

  3. #3
    Parabuteo is offline My Chrony has bought it a couple of times...
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Southampton
    Posts
    6,061
    RS52 is an excellent powder giving higher velocities with lower pressures. Going on what my Exe F class lot tell me it is very stable temp wise as well.

    The powder is steeped in nitro rather than the normal mixing methods which apparently makes it more consistent and easy to control (in terms of process).

    I have been using RS52 for a while in my 5.56x45 ammo and it shoots well. It also meters rather better than N140 which is nice for extruded powder.
    I'm a maggot in another life you know

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    leeds, west yorkshire
    Posts
    12,965
    Quote Originally Posted by Rickee View Post
    I have been using RS60 in my 260 for about a year now. I find it a clean powder, meters well and provides good velocities.
    RS60 is a high energy powder and therefore burns hot. I understand it is the same as RL17 and QuickLOAD shows them as being identical.
    bumping an old thread....rs60 is superb powder.
    just checked quickload and they is a slight difference between rl17 and rs60......it is on mine

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jul 2000
    Location
    Alnwick Northumberland
    Posts
    9,877
    Quote Originally Posted by loiner1965 View Post
    bumping an old thread....rs60 is superb powder.
    just checked quickload and they is a slight difference between rl17 and rs60......it is on mine
    RS60 is my powder of choice, however I'm sure Laurie Holland has said not to trust QL with RS powders
    Do nothing, achieve nothing

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    leeds, west yorkshire
    Posts
    12,965
    Quote Originally Posted by pbranthwaite View Post
    RS60 is my powder of choice, however I'm sure Laurie Holland has said not to trust QL with RS powders
    i always go on the manufacturers website first and compare their data etc....currently using 52gns for a 168smk in a 30-06....max is 54.5 gns

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Devizes
    Posts
    5,032
    Quote Originally Posted by loiner1965 View Post
    i always go on the manufacturers website first and compare their data etc....currently using 52gns for a 168smk in a 30-06....max is 54.5 gns
    They may have done some testing now but if you emailed them they used to just send out QL data!
    Thanks for looking

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    leeds, west yorkshire
    Posts
    12,965
    Quote Originally Posted by 223AI View Post
    They may have done some testing now but if you emailed them they used to just send out QL data!
    got the data for tr140 from shooting shed years ago but quickload as the rs powders on now

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Devizes
    Posts
    5,032
    Quote Originally Posted by pbranthwaite View Post
    RS60 is my powder of choice, however I'm sure Laurie Holland has said not to trust QL with RS powders
    He has and going on some results I’ve had compared to published data (for RL17) he’s right, this is also based on the fact that it is the same powder, which used to be called elcho 17 I believe
    Thanks for looking

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •