Thanks for the replies.
Nobody here having experience with the Fenton and Rat Works cylinders?
I don't want to spend more than 200/250 quids for titanium or V-Mach tubes...
Thanks for the replies.
Nobody here having experience with the Fenton and Rat Works cylinders?
I don't want to spend more than 200/250 quids for titanium or V-Mach tubes...
what was the make of the tube that split and who sold it. atb mick
Look at option 2 on their site and there is £220 which I don't want to spend for just 400g less weight.
Sorry to hear about a cylinder splitting...not funny at all.
I was interested in buying the A&M cylinder offered in the sales section but 4 years old an no valve
fitted so I better add 20 quids and get a brandnew one with warranty...
That's why I asked for Your experiences with the aftermarket cylinders :-)
Last edited by Luftgewehr100; 16-12-2018 at 04:34 PM. Reason: Tippfehler
Founder & ex secretary of Rivington Riflemen.
www.rivington-riflemen.uk
The pic of a crack across the thread is quite typical of aluminium failure under pressure. The split cylinder looks more like a welded seam having failed - and pressure vessels should be made from seamless tube or machined from solid. Aluminium is a material that is prone to having dislocations in its structure. Eliminating them requires expensive manufacturing methods all of which could be of no value if you then draw it out into a tube, a process which puts the bulk material under severe stress.
Steel handles the whole manufacturing process much better and from what I have read so does titanium.
Musing on this, I can't he;lp but wonder whether the ideal would be a hybrid tube, but that would be prohibitively expensive as pressure welding the inner and outer tubes together would require an explosion within a mould. Many ships and luxury yachts have steel hulls for strength and aluminium superstructure to reduce top hamper (weight). The interface between the two is a bi-metallic strip of steel/ali bonded by explosives. This dramatically reduces corrosion of the aluminium against the steel.
Rob.
Well looking at that picture, it's quite obvious that that cylinder as not been tested, as the law stands any pressure vessel holding less than 500cc, does not require testing, hence that rubbish, proper alloy pressure tube is as expensive as titanium, so i very much doubt at those prices its made from the correct grade tube, probably standard run of the mill seamless alloy tube at a tenner a metre, what some people will do to make a quick buck.
I can assure you that that's not a safety feature, if designed as a safety feature it would bulge at the front where the o ring seals, extruding the o ring and releasing the air, as the air arms range are designed to do if there over pressurised, but looking at that the o ring seals at the rear of the plug, so impossible to have any type of safety feature built in, all in all stick to steel or titanium cylinders.
Shaun
Was it worth the trouble, Ah, what trouble
I dont mind you saying. and it is vague.
If it was MY cylinder I would be screaming from the tops of the roofs but it wasn't. It was a well established and very regular club members who is also a friend and very trustworthy. He is also not a member of this or any other internet gun forum.
All I am saying is beware of cheap cylinders purchased new off e#ay.
Last edited by I. J.; 16-12-2018 at 06:55 PM.
Founder & ex secretary of Rivington Riflemen.
www.rivington-riflemen.uk
I know I have already posted my opinion.... But, an extra £50 or £100,even if it means waiting a bit and saving, or option 2, no hand..... There is only one answer!
The titanium tube is vastly superior to the others, handled over 700 bar without exploding, some of the aluminium ones are going pop at sub 200 bar... Its not worth the risk in my opinion.
Theoben TTR1 .177, Steven B Blue/Grey Laminate Stock, Nutshot Mod, Hawke Sidewinder 10x42 Tac IR
Daystate Pulsar. 177, Donny FL Sumo Mod, Pard NV008LRF