Results 1 to 15 of 38

Thread: Hw77 or hw57 ??

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    tinbum's Avatar
    tinbum is offline Killer Vampire Lesbians on scooters
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Daarn Saaarf!
    Posts
    19,531
    The 57 is an underlever format based around the Hw99, as such it's much lighter than the others mentioned. I would shoulder them and see how you feel.
    My ignore list: ​<Hidden information>

  2. #2
    Blackrider's Avatar
    Blackrider is offline It don't mean a thing, if it ain't got a Spring
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Perthshire the Heart of Scotland !
    Posts
    9,364
    All depends upon what you want to use it for Rob ?
    Sounds as if the HW 77k would fit your bill nicely and I'd go for .22 cal. !
    “An airgun or two”………

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Location
    Eastbourne
    Posts
    2,132
    I have a TX200 and I am thinking about purchasing an HW77 to use with open sights. One thing I would say about the TX is although heavy, the weight "intentionally" helps balance the recoil resulting in an amazingly accurate springer!!! Perfect for vermin

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Buckley, Flintshire.
    Posts
    1,075
    I've never owned a HW77, but I have owned a HW97k....it was heavy, on a par with the TX200 weight-wise. I've also owned a HW57, these are NOT heavy! Being honest the 97k is the better gun, but not as good as a TX (now I've done it!), but if I was going to buy a '57 or '77 it would be the '57. Much easier to haul about.
    HuMa regulated S200 .22...
    Artemis PP800 .177...
    Weihrauch HW45 .177

  5. #5
    Murphy is offline Cooee! Chase me you naughty boys!
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Wigan
    Posts
    22,392
    The 57 is not even half the rifle the other 3 are.
    Master Debater

  6. #6
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Location
    sunderland
    Posts
    866
    Haha mixed bag of opinions here ha,ive had a hw97k loved it but i got tennis elbow and arthritis in my shoulder so i sold it.tx200 is a gun i always wanted but ill struggle lug that about all afternoon.what about hw80 is that same weight as tx 200 and hw97k ??.

  7. #7
    Murphy is offline Cooee! Chase me you naughty boys!
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Wigan
    Posts
    22,392
    HW95k ?!
    Master Debater

  8. #8
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Location
    sunderland
    Posts
    866
    Ive had a hw95k nice n light but wasnt very good out the box,nice gun but i sold it after couple weeks.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Retford, Notts
    Posts
    35,216
    Quote Originally Posted by robhw97k View Post
    ,ive had a hw97k loved it but i got tennis elbow and arthritis in my shoulder so i sold it.tx200 is a gun i always wanted but ill struggle lug that about all afternoon.what about hw80 is that same weight as tx 200 and hw97k ??.
    Quote Originally Posted by Murphy View Post
    HW95k ?!
    Exactly my thoughs, Murphy, taking into account the OP's observations above.

    The 95 is lighter than the 97, 77, 80 and TX. A smooth operator and very accurate.

    Rob, try and handle / try out as many as you can. But from what you've said, the 95 would be in pole position to my mind.
    THE BOINGER BASH AT QUIGLEY HOLLOW. MAKING GREAT MEMORIES SINCE 15th JUNE, 2013.
    NEXT EVENT :- August 3/4, 2024.........BOING!!

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    worthing
    Posts
    3,333
    I'd go with the 57. The 77 lovely rifle - I've owned a couple in the past - but a real beast to lug around. As already mentioned, the 57 is basically an underlever 99s - light and handy - though you do really need to try both for size, see what suits best...

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •