Is it possible that by attempting to belittle someone else's work, Dave, that you feel you're in some way trying to bolster Chairgun as the prime source of ballistic data for airguns? I'm afraid that's how it's looking, to me, anyway.

Chairgun isn't particularly accurate either. Sorry to drop that on you, but Chairgun 1.8 said that I will need 68 clicks on my big nikko if I shoot AA fields at 55 yards, zeroed as I am at 23 yards wilth all other parameters as built.

Chairgun 2.? says - for EXACTLY the same physical parameters - I need 58 clicks. Practice tells me I need 56 clicks.

At the end of the day, does it really matter about a few clicks or a few fills? No, it doesn't.

The two can live along side each other in perfect harmony without picking holes in someone else's work.

This thread's sole aim was to provide FREE tables and charts to guide those folk who like that sort of thing.


Atb,


Chairgun can be downloaded here.