Results 1 to 15 of 42

Thread: New .69 Mini Cannon

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    edbear2 Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Denno View Post
    Just got an answer back about the steel, it's barrel grade 416ss.

    Mark
    Hi mark...was it heat treated + quench and temper?

    Or was it 416R grade?

    ATB, Ed
    Last edited by edbear2; 07-04-2013 at 05:26 PM.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Formby, Merseyside
    Posts
    310
    Quote Originally Posted by edbear2 View Post
    Hi mark...was it heat treated + quench and temper?

    Or was it 416R grade?

    ATB, Ed
    I'm not sure, the production process was described to me and don't remember that being mentioned.

  3. #3
    Jim McArthur is offline Frock coat wearing, riverboat dwelling, southern gent
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    New Orleans, Louisiana
    Posts
    5,887
    I wonder when the last homicide or robbery was committed with a muzzle loader in the UK?

    Muzzleloaders should be exempt from legal restrictions, given their low likelihood of criminal abuse.

    However, it also seems to me that UK law also seems to try to anticipate and control intended legal use, at the time of sale, or at any point during possession.

    Case in point: an original 1851 Colt revolver would be uncontrolled, if the purchaser / possessor intends it only for a curio or ornament: but Section 1, if he intends to shoot it at the range.
    UBC's Police Pistol Manager
    "Nasty, noisy things, revolvers, Count. Better stick to air-guns." Sherlock Holmes, The Adventure of the Mazarin Stone

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Huntingdon
    Posts
    9,253
    Quote Originally Posted by Jim McArthur View Post
    I wonder when the last homicide or robbery was committed with a muzzle loader in the UK?

    Muzzleloaders should be exempt from legal restrictions, given their low likelihood of criminal abuse.

    However, it also seems to me that UK law also seems to try to anticipate and control intended legal use, at the time of sale, or at any point during possession.

    Case in point: an original 1851 Colt revolver would be uncontrolled, if the purchaser / possessor intends it only for a curio or ornament: but Section 1, if he intends to shoot it at the range.
    It seems that the last recorded use of a BP percussion pistol being deliberately used with intent to cause harm was 1926. With long arms, it's a bit more difficult, as many shotguns used BP cartridges - generally available here until well into the 1960's, and many shotguns were used in crime before and since.

    However, there is no recorded use of a BP rifle of any kind being used in crime in UK since at least 1870.

    tac

  5. #5
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Doncaster
    Posts
    4,876
    Quote Originally Posted by tacfoley View Post
    It seems that the last recorded use of a BP percussion pistol being deliberately used with intent to cause harm was 1926. With long arms, it's a bit more difficult, as many shotguns used BP cartridges - generally available here until well into the 1960's, and many shotguns were used in crime before and since.

    However, there is no recorded use of a BP rifle of any kind being used in crime in UK since at least 1870.

    tac
    I doubt if there's ever been a case of anyone coming backwards out of a bank or post office holding the staff at bay with a belt buckle gun but they still got banned.

    Oddly enough we had a case of attempted murder 5 miles from me in May where the weapon was a walking stick .410 so maybe we just haven't waited long enough yet. The .410 was described in court as an antique and the shooter got 5.5 years for having it. The attempted murder charge fizzled out because the victim declined to give evidence. I believe the 2 parties were related. I also think it might have shortened the respective Xmas card lists.

    ATVB, Mick
    When guns are outlawed only outlaws will have guns .

  6. #6
    davederrick's Avatar
    davederrick is offline With our thoughts, we make the world
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Bristol
    Posts
    11,695
    Quote Originally Posted by Jim McArthur View Post
    Muzzleloaders should be exempt from legal restrictions, given their low likelihood of criminal abuse.
    They are exempt in the US aren't they ?
    "I'm all in favour of keeping dangerous weapons out of the hands of fools. Lets start with typewriters." - Frank Lloyd Wright (1867-1959)

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Huntingdon
    Posts
    9,253
    Quote Originally Posted by davederrick View Post
    They are exempt in the US aren't they ?
    Yes, mostly. However, there ARE states in the Union where ANY kind of a handgun is prohibited. Surprise?

    tac

  8. #8
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Doncaster
    Posts
    4,876
    Quote Originally Posted by tacfoley View Post
    Yes, mostly. However, there ARE states in the Union where ANY kind of a handgun is prohibited. Surprise?

    tac
    I've a pal who ( understandedly ) bitterly resents the UK handgun ban. I love to recount, in his hearing, of standing at the counter of a gunshop in Coeur d' Alene in Idaho. The chap in front of me had just selected a pistol and the assistant completed the sale by saying ' Right, Sir, I just need a major credit card and sight of your Concealed Weapon Permit and that's it!' 2 minutes later he was on the street, armed and dangerous.

    Wonder if I can lure Pete into reading this ......
    ATB, Mick
    When guns are outlawed only outlaws will have guns .

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Huntingdon
    Posts
    9,253
    Quote Originally Posted by walnutfarmmick View Post
    I've a pal who ( understandedly ) bitterly resents the UK handgun ban. I love to recount, in his hearing, of standing at the counter of a gunshop in Coeur d' Alene in Idaho. The chap in front of me had just selected a pistol and the assistant completed the sale by saying ' Right, Sir, I just need a major credit card and sight of your Concealed Weapon Permit and that's it!' 2 minutes later he was on the street, armed and dangerous.

    Wonder if I can lure Pete into reading this ......
    ATB, Mick
    Well, I hafta advise you that as the buyer already had a CCW, it was not necessary to have the usual formal check, which can take up to three or four days. Rarely as in Oregon, it can take as long as twenty seconds, where all you need is your Oregon ODOT DL and a suitable method of payment for guns or ammunition. ALL transactions, however, have to be noted by the dealer, to cover his a** in case of any future hassle.

    I'm a little unhappy that you added the remark 'armed and dangerous', - not needed, Sir. The FACT hat he has a CCW means that he is legally entitled to carry a handgun for self-defence, or, acting as an 'armed citizen' in Federal Law, to use the gun to defend others if necessary, or to hold a person caught in a criminal act IF the state in which his CCW is issued permits this. As such, he is not dangerous, except to another threatening person armed and in a mood to cause harm to other innocent people. Where we live in Oregon for part of the year, everybody has a CCW, and remember too that Oregon is an 'open carry' state, except in metro Portland.

    tac

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •