Results 1 to 15 of 21

Thread: Revolver cylinder chamfering question

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Ashford
    Posts
    1,222
    Wouldn't surprise me if it was done to facilitate easy loading of conicals or other non-spherical ammo. Lead balls may cut in easy but a square base round is much harder to accurately seat without the chamfer.
    It also reduces the chance of damage if you're careless and don't properly align the cylinder before ramming. Yes; proper technique will avoid this, but how often have you seen the wonderful 'tube vids of people who shouldn't be allowed near firearms.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Huntingdon
    Posts
    9,253
    Quote Originally Posted by Solvo View Post
    Wouldn't surprise me if it was done to facilitate easy loading of conicals or other non-spherical ammo. Lead balls may cut in easy but a square base round is much harder to accurately seat without the chamfer.
    It also reduces the chance of damage if you're careless and don't properly align the cylinder before ramming. Yes; proper technique will avoid this, but how often have you seen the wonderful 'tube vids of people who shouldn't be allowed near firearms.
    The base of the Lee conical, made especially for the ROA, has a reduced chamfer to make it easy to enter the opening of the chamber. It's not the easiest, but it does make things easier than a true flat base conical.

    tac

  3. #3
    Turnup's Avatar
    Turnup is offline Dialling code‎: ‎01344
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Crowthorne
    Posts
    5,494
    Correction: I earlier refereed to Mr Tanner as "Jim" - on reflection I am pretty sure he is in fact "Jeff"
    True freedom includes the freedom to make mistakes or do foolish things and bear the consequences.
    TANSTAAFL

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Huntingdon
    Posts
    9,253
    Quote Originally Posted by Turnup View Post
    Correction: I earlier refereed to Mr Tanner as "Jim" - on reflection I am pretty sure he is in fact "Jeff"
    Correct. I call him Mr Tanner, as we have not been introduced.

    tac

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •