Who agrees with idea for new RULE on sales - ?

[colin g]

I also like pics of the item for sale, I personally find they help as by the time you have asked for pics the item has usually been sold unseen or through pm. All sales through pm should see sellers banned for a period then we all know where we are up to.. Yes on the thread only and photo`s and date compulsory,,
I also dont post photo`s through url at all so unless its coming off my camera or desktop then it is not going to be for sale on a forum.. Fed up with clicking on a picture then having to untick all the boxes for that particular hosting site,, Col.

[Zomboid]

For me if the seller is unwilling to put up or send pictures then its the buyers choice ultimately.

If you want to sell something why on earth wouldnt you want to show it? More so if its something expensive.

[eyebull]

I also like pics of the item for sale, I personally find they help as by the time you have asked for pics the item has usually been sold unseen or through pm. All sales through pm should see sellers banned for a period then we all know where we are up to.. Yes on the thread only and photo`s and date compulsory,,
I also dont post photo`s through url at all so unless its coming off my camera or desktop then it is not going to be for sale on a forum.. Fed up with clicking on a picture then having to untick all the boxes for that particular hosting site,, Col.

I agree that hosting sites are a PITA, but you don't need a hosting site to post pictures in the sales section here.

[WILBA]

I also like pics of the item for sale, I personally find they help as by the time you have asked for pics the item has usually been sold unseen or through pm. All sales through pm should see sellers banned for a period then we all know where we are up to.. Yes on the thread only and photo`s and date compulsory,,
I also dont post photo`s through url at all so unless its coming off my camera or desktop then it is not going to be for sale on a forum.. Fed up with clicking on a picture then having to untick all the boxes for that particular hosting site,, Col.

Why only the sellers band?????

[Unframed Dave]

Why only the sellers band?????

Why either banned when the rules allow it?

Dave

[WILBA]

I also like pics of the item for sale, I personally find they help as by the time you have asked for pics the item has usually been sold unseen or through pm. All sales through pm should see sellers banned for a period then we all know where we are up to.. Yes on the thread only and photo`s and date compulsory,,
I also dont post photo`s through url at all so unless its coming off my camera or desktop then it is not going to be for sale on a forum.. Fed up with clicking on a picture then having to untick all the boxes for that particular hosting site,, Col.

Ok i was not gonna say anything but here is why pics dont work in showing gun flaws. A good while ago i bought a pistol on here. I recieved pics. Seller said it had the odd age related mark so was not brilliant but a usable gun. Only thing he could said was wrong was that the bulb seal had gone. He said it dumped the C02 when he put a bulb in it so thinks the bulb seal had gone but be could not be bothered to change it so was selling it off cheap as an easy fix. . Gun looked ok in the pics from what i could see so i went and bought it. What he neglected to say was that you cannot now buy the seals anywhere so stuck with a gun i cannot use.also what he neglected to mention was the rear sight was not original and was bloody glued on. Could not see that from the pics i recieved either. Then on stripping the slide off to check it over the pin holding the false hammer fell out. Reason it fell out was because it was not the original pin and infact was just a bit of round steel cut off with pliers. This lose pin has gouged the slide inside due to it moving side to side when firing the gun. I fixed this fault but the rear sight i am buggerd with as you cant buy them now. I bought this off is a long standing member on her with a high post count. So how would pics have helped me in this case then???

[angrybear]

Ok i was not gonna say anything but here is why pics dont work in showing gun flaws. A good while ago i bought a pistol on here. I recieved pics. Seller said it had the odd age related mark so was not brilliant but a usable gun. Only thing he could said was wrong was that the bulb seal had gone. He said it dumped the C02 when he put a bulb in it so thinks the bulb seal had gone but be could not be bothered to change it so was selling it off cheap as an easy fix. . Gun looked ok in the pics from what i could see so i went and bought it. What he neglected to say was that you cannot now buy the seals anywhere so stuck with a gun i cannot use.also what he neglected to mention was the rear sight was not original and was bloody glued on. Could not see that from the pics i recieved either. Then on stripping the slide off to check it over the pin holding the false hammer fell out. Reason it fell out was because it was not the original pin and infact was just a bit of round steel cut off with pliers. This lose pin has gouged the slide inside due to it moving side to side when firing the gun. I fixed this fault but the rear sight i am buggerd with as you cant buy them now. I bought this off is a long standing member on her with a high post count. So how would pics have helped me in this case then???

Well those faults/issues not being disclosed show the seller to be either a dishonest t*at, or possibly unaware of the internal defects, (we don't all take them apart)

Either way, things like spares availability & internal condition would not have been known even in a ftf deal so have no relevance to photos.

[where's it gone]

There's always a trick in photography
https://youtu.be/vrUQ0X7SI-M

[bighit]

If I was to buy an item that was no longer made and I was told that a seal was blown then I would have looked to see if spares were available .

I was going to buy an old .22 rimfire from my local RFD cheap and I found out the reason it was cheap was that spares were non existent and the rifle in question would no doubt need spares as it was far from pristine in looks plus it needed a few parts replaced but at £50 it was dirt cheap. If I had bought it may have became a paper weight .

Bottom line is don't expect the seller to tell you what you could have researched yourself especially when you have been told the thing may need spares like seals .

[madcarlos]

Most on here are trusted sellers, Any concern I would rather face to face ,

[WILBA]

If I was to buy an item that was no longer made and I was told that a seal was blown then I would have looked to see if spares were available .

I was going to buy an old .22 rimfire from my local RFD cheap and I found out the reason it was cheap was that spares were non existent and the rifle in question would no doubt need spares as it was far from pristine in looks plus it needed a few parts replaced but at £50 it was dirt cheap. If I had bought it may have became a paper weight .

Bottom line is don't expect the seller to tell you what you could have researched yourself especially when you have been told the thing may need spares like seals .

Dam wish i had you as my crystal ball. As he was a long standing member a little to much trust was put his way. Will not fall far that shite again.

[bighit]

Dam wish i had you as my crystal ball. As he was a long standing member a little to much trust was put his way. Will not fall far that shite again.

He did say it had a leak as you admitted in your post correct ?

Your words from the above post

Quote

Only thing he could said was wrong was that the bulb seal had gone. He said it dumped the C02 when he put a bulb in it so thinks the bulb seal had gone but be could not be bothered to change it so was selling it off cheap as an easy fix

If I was told the above I would have done a search to find out if spares were available before I bought it and I guess others would also have done the same .

It does not matter how long the seller has been on here to be ripped off . Its happened before and no doubt will happen again.

[nonmank]

Following the forum advice around buying and selling.

I bought a sidewinder scope and offered to paypal immediately, but was told bank transfer only?

I asked again and the seller agreed to provide a paypal address.

Sadly then he updated the sale as 'still for sale' and someone happily bank transferred the money

[WILBA]

He did say it had a leak as you admitted in your post correct ?

Your words from the above post

Quote

Only thing he could said was wrong was that the bulb seal had gone. He said it dumped the C02 when he put a bulb in it so thinks the bulb seal had gone but be could not be bothered to change it so was selling it off cheap as an easy fix

If I was told the above I would have done a search to find out if spares were available before I bought it and I guess others would also have done the same .

It does not matter how long the seller has been on here to be ripped off . Its happened before and no doubt will happen again.

Neglected to say about the glued on bloody back sight though eh and unless you had a close up pic you would not see that it was glued. . Bighit you always reply negitively. Yes the spare parts as in the seal i should have checked but the rear right is not original and was glued on ffs. If a long standing member tucks you up you have no chance with a newbie eh. Just leave it there!

[harvey_s]

Although I do use photos, I have to use an external site to host them as posting photos here is a right royal PITA.

Where people get into trouble is falling over themselves for a 'bargain' when they could have asked for pictures anyway.

Remember the old days when you used buy things from classified ads in papers?