Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 37

Thread: A picture of the updated Diana piston with the new crimp.

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    look no hands's Avatar
    look no hands is offline Even better looking than a HW35
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Coventry, even closer to Tony L.
    Posts
    12,143
    Quote Originally Posted by robs5230 View Post
    I really wish I hadn't seen that Barry.

    After turning god knows how many rifles out with iffy pistons, they've now decided they need to crimp them a little harder ??

    Looks like someone on work experience has "had a go"

    On the list of top ten attempts to bodge a cure, this has pipped HW's 99"cure" by a fair margin.

    Certainly put the lid on me owning another Diana.
    My thoughts exactly, I think my 34 may be getting sold soon.

    Pete
    Far too many rifles to list now, all mainly British but the odd pesky foreigner has snuck in

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    bideford
    Posts
    2,917
    Quote Originally Posted by look no hands View Post
    My thoughts exactly, I think my 34 may be getting sold soon.

    Pete
    Yep.
    I may offload mine now.
    We may have to be quick though
    B.A.S.C. member

  3. #3
    Barryg's Avatar
    Barryg is offline Registered ̶D̶i̶a̶n̶a̶ User
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Nr. YEOVIL
    Posts
    5,070
    Quote Originally Posted by robs5230 View Post
    Yep.
    I may offload mine now.
    We may have to be quick though
    So does this mean that both you and Pete would sell guns that you suspect are dangerous


    There is something that was said by the owner of the piston in the pic, he said was that it was Umarex who sent him the piston and I was wondering if it was Umarex that done the bodge not Diana, we still don't know for sure how the stem is fixed in.

    I don't think that we can compare this bodge with the 99 bodge because the 99 is a budget gun and these 52 pistons are in the 48/52/54/56/460/470/k98 and more just look at the price of a 56 and compare it with the 99 price

    I think that a email to Diana is required to try to get some accurate info

  4. #4
    look no hands's Avatar
    look no hands is offline Even better looking than a HW35
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Coventry, even closer to Tony L.
    Posts
    12,143
    Quote Originally Posted by Barryg View Post
    So does this mean that both you and Pete would sell guns that you suspect are dangerous


    There is something that was said by the owner of the piston in the pic, he said was that it was Umarex who sent him the piston and I was wondering if it was Umarex that done the bodge not Diana, we still don't know for sure how the stem is fixed in.

    I don't think that we can compare this bodge with the 99 bodge because the 99 is a budget gun and these 52 pistons are in the 48/52/54/56/460/470/k98 and more just look at the price of a 56 and compare it with the 99 price

    I think that a email to Diana is required to try to get some accurate info
    I've been meaning to sell my 34 for ages as I just don't use it and I could do with the money to either buy more BSA's or spend it on the ones I already have

    It still doesn't instil any confidence in me when last year I had the sear snap and now this problem, fair enough mine isn't wobbly or come away yet but I have had it happen on a Chinese copy.

    Just because the cost of the Diana's you've mentioned are far higher than the 99 doesn't mean they are built any better or with superior materials, Diana's have always been expensive in this country and that's down to the importers charging a fortune for them and that's why there's hardly any market for them.

    Pete
    Far too many rifles to list now, all mainly British but the odd pesky foreigner has snuck in

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Exeter
    Posts
    1,137
    I guess on the up side Diana have made it easier for the shed tuners to tinker with the Diana as it looks like the rods come out easy!!!
    Hum which is worse I wonder the hw77 cocking arm cracking and letting go, or the Diana rod coming out!!

  6. #6
    Barryg's Avatar
    Barryg is offline Registered ̶D̶i̶a̶n̶a̶ User
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Nr. YEOVIL
    Posts
    5,070
    Quote Originally Posted by look no hands View Post
    I've been meaning to sell my 34 for ages as I just don't use it and I could do with the money to either buy more BSA's or spend it on the ones I already have

    It still doesn't instil any confidence in me when last year I had the sear snap and now this problem, fair enough mine isn't wobbly or come away yet but I have had it happen on a Chinese copy.
    LOL thats even worse you are prepared to sell a gun with two suspected dangers i'm not sure how many suspected dangers Robs thinks there might be but he says he might be unloading his Diana quickly that doesn't instill confidence in me buying S/H,
    I don't think anyone should sell a gun if they suspect its safety this piston thing needs to be resolved because the rest of the gun is the best

    BTW im not sure how, say a TX piston would handle the stresses that the diana's have to put up with in America with some of the huge springs that are crammed into them, this is why Diana's are so robust.

  7. #7
    look no hands's Avatar
    look no hands is offline Even better looking than a HW35
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Coventry, even closer to Tony L.
    Posts
    12,143
    Quote Originally Posted by Barryg View Post
    LOL thats even worse you are prepared to sell a gun with two suspected dangers i'm not sure how many suspected dangers Robs thinks there might be but he says he might be unloading his Diana quickly that doesn't instill confidence in me buying S/H,
    I don't think anyone should sell a gun if they suspect its safety this piston thing needs to be resolved because the rest of the gun is the best

    BTW im not sure how, say a TX piston would handle the stresses that the diana's have to put up with in America with some of the huge springs that are crammed into them, this is why Diana's are so robust.
    Well I certainly won't be keeping it any longer just because we've not heard what Diana have to say about the matter (if you even get a reply from Diana or even if they give a shit), if I worried about what might happen in the future with either the piston rod or the NEW trigger sear I fitted last year, then we should all worry about what might happen with the other rifles we sell and even things like our cars, I have enough things to worry about in my everyday life with out having to worry about what might happen to one of my air rifles because the maker decides to use a bit of a dodgy way to fix it's pistons together, do you think people who buy/sell HW77/97's worry about losing their thumb or the next persons when they sell it, if the sear should snap and send the piston and cylinder into some unfortunate persons butt plug.

    These little things are just the final push for me to finally sell it on.

    Pete
    Far too many rifles to list now, all mainly British but the odd pesky foreigner has snuck in

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    bideford
    Posts
    2,917
    Quote Originally Posted by Barryg View Post
    LOL thats even worse you are prepared to sell a gun with two suspected dangers i'm not sure how many suspected dangers Robs thinks there might be but he says he might be unloading his Diana quickly that doesn't instill confidence in me buying S/H,
    I don't think anyone should sell a gun if they suspect its safety this piston thing needs to be resolved because the rest of the gun is the best

    BTW im not sure how, say a TX piston would handle the stresses that the diana's have to put up with in America with some of the huge springs that are crammed into them, this is why Diana's are so robust.
    As I 've stated Barry I've had my pistons out and know the rods are centred and well fixed. And as I've also stated, I reckon its an issue with FAC predominantly.


    All air rifles are dangerous, my Diana's no more than any other

    I've shot Dianas since the 80's and only the last couple of days, heard of this issue. Never had an issue on any of mine.
    As for the TX, they wont make anywhere near the power of the larger Dianas so we'll never know
    B.A.S.C. member

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    bideford
    Posts
    2,917
    Quote Originally Posted by Barryg View Post
    So does this mean that both you and Pete would sell guns that you suspect are dangerous


    There is something that was said by the owner of the piston in the pic, he said was that it was Umarex who sent him the piston and I was wondering if it was Umarex that done the bodge not Diana, we still don't know for sure how the stem is fixed in.

    I don't think that we can compare this bodge with the 99 bodge because the 99 is a budget gun and these 52 pistons are in the 48/52/54/56/460/470/k98 and more just look at the price of a 56 and compare it with the 99 price

    I think that a email to Diana is required to try to get some accurate info
    I have no reason to suspect my Diana's are dangerous . I've had the pistons out of the rifles on all 3 to true up the out of round front end. All 3 have solidly fixed rods that are fixed true.
    At least I know mine are good for certain (at this point in time anyway).

    Do you therefore mean in light of this, no one should sell a used Diana ? Or maybe even a new one ? How many out there have loose rods is anyone's guess.

    I'm unlikely to be rushing into selling mine ( well maybe one of the K's as I have 2 the same). The comment about getting rid was tongue in cheek.
    However, the likelihood of me buying another is very slim.
    B.A.S.C. member

  10. #10
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Newcastle-under-Lyme
    Posts
    3,636
    I very much doubt the piston rod is longer. That would mean reworking one of the major parts in this assembly. They clearly have no intention in doing that.

    They are mass producing these things to a minimum cost or there would have gone more effort into this than smashing them all together with a load of pressure.

    It looks like they have realised that some problems have arisen re loose rods and the odd rod coming out. So the answer is to give it a second smash together.

    Not engineering purity ... but if it works it works. They aren't looking to flog Olympic Match accuracy here in these type of rifles. Just mass produced samples that will give most of the world decent enough power from a simple break barrel airgun to pop some tins in the garden or some bushy tails in the trees out to about 40 yards.

    Unlike the 'Tune them to the Nth to squeeze another 3% accuracy out of them' brigade on here ... Diana aren't interested in that.

    A 2 lb hammer knocks nails in. It doesn't have to be engineered to a tolerance of 0.001". It doesn't have to be Gold plated. You just want it to knock nails in and the head doesn't fly off and kill the bloke behind you. If this extra crushing fixes the safety issue ... it's sorted.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Pontypridd South Wales uk
    Posts
    1,848
    Quote Originally Posted by bozzer View Post
    I very much doubt the piston rod is longer. That would mean reworking one of the major parts in this assembly. They clearly have no intention in doing that.

    They are mass producing these things to a minimum cost or there would have gone more effort into this than smashing them all together with a load of pressure.

    It looks like they have realised that some problems have arisen re loose rods and the odd rod coming out. So the answer is to give it a second smash together.

    Not engineering purity ... but if it works it works. They aren't looking to flog Olympic Match accuracy here in these type of rifles. Just mass produced samples that will give most of the world decent enough power from a simple break barrel airgun to pop some tins in the garden or some bushy tails in the trees out to about 40 yards.

    Unlike the 'Tune them to the Nth to squeeze another 3% accuracy out of them' brigade on here ... Diana aren't interested in that.

    A 2 lb hammer knocks nails in. It doesn't have to be engineered to a tolerance of 0.001". It doesn't have to be Gold plated. You just want it to knock nails in and the head doesn't fly off and kill the bloke behind you. If this extra crushing fixes the safety issue ... it's sorted.
    Very nicely put and makes perfect sense....

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Cambridge UK
    Posts
    7,074
    So ... is there now a market for an 'aftermarket' piston pinning service?

    Could it be done by drilling through then fixing a hardened steel pin in place? ... just in case?
    Cheers, Phil

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    bideford
    Posts
    2,917
    Quote Originally Posted by Phil Russell View Post
    So ... is there now a market for an 'aftermarket' piston pinning service?

    Could it be done by drilling through then fixing a hardened steel pin in place? ... just in case?
    Cheers, Phil
    I don't think I'd be tempted to go that route Phil. A 10mm piston rod with a perfectly centred pin of say 3mm diameter leaves little enough rod either side.
    Maybe on an unstressed, round piston but these are neither.

    I reckon pinning may cause failure sooner than leaving as is.
    Did you see the pic of the rod that snapped earlier in the thread ?

    As commented in one of the earlier posts, I reckon the issues will be more apparent with our power hungry friends from over the pond.
    A 52 doing in excess of 24ft/lbs experiences rather more shock than one ticking over at 11.
    B.A.S.C. member

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Cambridge UK
    Posts
    7,074
    Quote Originally Posted by robs5230 View Post
    I don't think I'd be tempted to go that route Phil. A 10mm piston rod with a perfectly centred pin of say 3mm diameter leaves little enough rod either side.
    Maybe on an unstressed, round piston but these are neither.

    I reckon pinning may cause failure sooner than leaving as is.
    Did you see the pic of the rod that snapped earlier in the thread ?
    I have no intention of doing this, mainly as I have no need / no piston etc but the thought came to me when I recalled all the comments at the start of the topic. There was much speculation on 'pinning'.
    I must say I am surprised at Diana in doing this, even though it seems acceptable in the majority of cases. But it does seem a second rate engineering solution. If there was a piston failure in the USA I wonder if the various forms of litigation might come to bear and force Diana and presumably other manufacturers to prove that their method of construction was safe.
    Cheers, Phil

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    aberdeenshire
    Posts
    25,209
    you are only seeing what people have reported on line ,There may be another one or two or even a thousand that have let go but the owners just put it down to wear and tear and they don't use airgun forums .

    Not all airgun owners are on airgun forums


    Like most things out there ,people will only say "Oh mine did that too" if they hear it happened to some one else .

    And if you think Diana will tell you how they put them together then go for it and ask but don't expect a reply if they know there could be an issue . Remember " Diana was shocked " surely if they were that shocked a recall may have been issued .

    Did they reply to your query about the sears snapping? did you even write to them Barry ?

    But until the other owners that have had it happen to their there will be an assumption of its only one that its happened to so its a one off so send the guy another piston.

    Or they could be doing a HW99 and saying its fine pump more out the fools will still buy them.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •