I have an HW97K that I would like to have a go at some outdoor shooting with (as a change from a lifetime of indoor paper-punching) and I am guessing that HFT would be a good place to start if I wanted to shoot with a springer?
I know nothing about telescopic sights, and some good advice could well save me some pain by helping me to avoid buying something that would not be the best choice for use on a springer for HFT use.
When I bought the .177 HW97K (probably three years ago!) I was told that this type of rifle (HW97K) had done particularly well in some of the springer events and that it would be good choice for HFT use (in the springer class). If this is the case then a good sight could make it an ideal rifle to compete with.
At the moment I have a relatively inexpensive Nikko Stirling Mountmaster 3-9 x 40 AO sight fitted to it (it came with the rifle) and I expect it would work OK but some advice on a better quality sight choice would be welcomed - especially with regards to the suitability of the build construction for regular use on a springer.
The recoil of the HW97 is my main concern as I have heard tales about some of the less expensive (or weaker build strength designs) not being able to take the pounding over a long period of time - and I appreciate that a good sight could be just as important important as the rifle.
Rossendale Target Shooting Club. Every Tuesday and Thursday evening 7 - 10pm.
cmars2018,
I liked fixed magnification optics.
I have used the below scopes for HFT with complete satisfaction :
1) Tasco/SWFA 10x42M
2) Hawke 10x42 Sidewinder 30
They both have side parallax correction.
I have had the 10x42M since 1996, and it is still going strong - it has had over 10,000 rounds of .308 Winchester under it's belt, and it has never missed a beat
For me, I have found the Hawke to be an excellent performer - I believe this scope has now been discontinued
Have fun & a good Sunday
Best regards
Russ
Thanks Russ.
I have noticed how the Hawke brand keeps coming up with good reviews from satisfied owners.
Dan has done well with the Hawke Vantage Max 4-12 x 40 on his springer over a decent enough time period to know that it is a good choice, and the 」120 new price would be tempting too, but this sight is currently "unavailable" everywhere that I have looked - so far!
There is a very good offer on the same sight but in the bigger 4-12 x 50 size, but I am guessing it would not be as well suited for HFT as the smaller 4-12 x 40 but probably shares the same excellent "value for money" build quality.
Shame about the 50mm size - it is a good looking scope and a very good price.
Last edited by zooma; 18-03-2018 at 07:13 PM.
Rossendale Target Shooting Club. Every Tuesday and Thursday evening 7 - 10pm.
I've just had a look and can't find any either. Wonder why there's none around
Like you said I've used the Hawke scopes for a while. They've been perfect on any springer I've tried them on, don't seem affected by the recoil at all. I think the most adjustment I've made to my zero this year was 2 clicks.
I would avoid 50mm objective for HFT, too many parallax issues at the very close and very far targets.
If I needed another scope right now, I would probably look at the Airmax 4-12x40 AO AMX
https://www.opticswarehouse.co.uk/pr...mx-riflescope/
That looks good but is the build quality as good as your favourite Hawke, and what would be the advantage of the more expensive Hawke Sidewinder I see on your rifle (Facebook) ?
At the other end of the scale, this one looked good for 」75 but it only goes up to x9 magnification:-
Hawke Vantage MAX Air Rifle Scope 3-9x40 AO 1/2 MilDot Reticle Riflescope 14181
or this one at 」79:-
Hawke Vantage Air Rifle Scope 4-12x40 AO MILDOT RETICLE Riflescope 14141
Last edited by zooma; 18-03-2018 at 09:17 PM.
Rossendale Target Shooting Club. Every Tuesday and Thursday evening 7 - 10pm.
I think the Airmax is almost identical to the Vantage Max, except it has a different reticle.
The 3-9x40 for 」75 seems very good value. You would be limited to 9x mag, but most of us only use 10x mag anyway, so it wouldn't actually be much different.
The Vantage Mildot (NOT the Vantage Max) has a much thicker reticle, and doesn't have the half mil dots. I personally prefer the thinner reticle on the 'Max' version. It would be worth getting to your local club and having a look through a couple to see what type of reticle you prefer
A more expensive version (such as the Sidewinder) benefits from better glass and more coatings on the lenses. This should give a clearer image in a wider range of conditions. Unfortunately I haven't had a chance to use my Sidewinder much and I don't want to change scopes at the moment. Maybe in a few months I will put the Sidewinder on and see how it compares to my current scope
[QUOTE=cooper_dan;7461580]I've just had a look and can't find any either. Wonder why there's none around
Just found one in a gunsmiths stock - should be here next week !
Rossendale Target Shooting Club. Every Tuesday and Thursday evening 7 - 10pm.
Rossendale Target Shooting Club. Every Tuesday and Thursday evening 7 - 10pm.
You chair an association.....https://youtu.be/gXN1yxax448
..."My son," said the Norman Baron...."The Saxon is not like us Normans. His manners are not so polite. But he never means anything serious till he talks about justice and right"...
On my HW97 I use the MTC Optisan EVX 10x44 Side Focus half mildot scope, which is the new version of the MTC Viper 10x44, a very popular scope for HFT.
It has good glass and the half midot reticule has some very useful windage markings. 」79 off:
http://www.uttings.co.uk/p122412-mtc.../#.Wr63otTwbIU
A few people I shoot with use the Hawke Vantage 3-12x44 Side Focus half mildot and do very well with it, but as people have said it depends what suits your eye.
http://www.uttings.co.uk/p121302-haw.../#.Wr6489TwbIU
for the extra 」30 the MTC Optisan has better quality glass.
Scopes with side focus cost more but are supposed to suffer less with parallax error.
You've got a good rifle so try to get the best scope you can.
Enjoy!
Matt.
Hey Matt,
Would you be able to explain this statement?
I never heard of this, and I wonder why it would be so..
personally, I use an old Hawke Frontier 3-9x40 non AO, reparallaxed to 27 y.
I found the AO 40 mm objective Hawkes dont fit in low Sportsmatch mounts, and I prefer mounting the scope as low as possible.
Oscar
HW 97 K .177 16 J - HW 99 S .22 16 J - HW 77 K .22 16 J - HW 80 K .22 16 J - HW 98 .177 16 J - Air Arms Pro Elite .177 23 J - Air Arms TX200 mkII .177 16 J - Air Arms TX200 mkII .22 16 J