Results 1 to 15 of 131

Thread: Tx200 zero transfer port

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Near Wimbledon, SW London, or Lusaka, Zambia
    Posts
    26,469
    Yeah, zephyr grooves, but you need a port (i got a few fps extra when I tried this, but not a lot)...

    Mote is a 2mm thick 25mm OD washer stuck in the end of the comp tube, with a nicely radiused port, 4mm should be fine. Radius can be quite wide/deep as the port vol is so low.. would only be around 0.5mm of parallel sided port in there (after the entry porting).

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Stockport
    Posts
    6,058
    quick drawing, no detail on taper as i have no time to measure a spot drill (which i still feel will be best...a small one )

    https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/920660/wonky2.png

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jul 2000
    Location
    Tremar
    Posts
    14,239
    Ideally the entry should be a radius rather than a chamfer, if you can manage it. Maybe be easier done by hand?
    www.shebbearshooters.co.uk. Ask for Rich and try the coffee

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Near Wimbledon, SW London, or Lusaka, Zambia
    Posts
    26,469
    Would the exit side 5mm not be better off staying at or below the calibre ? Otherwise the diverged air is going to hit into the breech face ?

  5. #5
    Snooper601 is offline I likes to polish my trophy
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Dunstable, Beds
    Posts
    5,761
    Quote Originally Posted by Jon Budd View Post
    Would the exit side 5mm not be better off staying at or below the calibre ? Otherwise the diverged air is going to hit into the breech face ?
    Port matching like is done when porting an inlet port on an engine. I managed a very useful gain by removing the square edged step on a Fiat twin cam 2l engine where the inlet port in the head met the inlet manifold, it made enough extra power to increase the top speed on the Autobhan by 25mph and that was nearly 25 years ago.

    Cheers

    John
    Snooper601 Suspect a simple fault, or a simple engineer He who dies with the most toys wins!
    QHAC Official lubricant development engineer.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Stockport
    Posts
    6,058
    Quote Originally Posted by Jon Budd View Post
    Would the exit side 5mm not be better off staying at or below the calibre ? Otherwise the diverged air is going to hit into the breech face ?
    the entry is 5mm, the exit will be a lot less...i should have labelled the drawing a little better.

    5mm to 3.6mm taper, then 1mm at 3.6mm, then 3.6 to say 4.2 on the exit side

    entry side radius cut, polished....im thinking it will work well

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Near Wimbledon, SW London, or Lusaka, Zambia
    Posts
    26,469
    Ahh sorry, yeah, makes more sense that way lol... in my mind they always flow R > L
    Are you left handed ?

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Pontypridd
    Posts
    1,835
    Guys you can use a radiused center bit (as opposed to the 60deg type) for the inlet into the port, they come in many sizes, surely you can find something close to what you want?

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Retford, Notts
    Posts
    35,226
    Quote Originally Posted by Jon Budd View Post

    Mote is a 2mm thick 25mm OD washer stuck in the end of the comp tube, with a nicely radiused port, 4mm should be fine. Radius can be quite wide/deep as the port vol is so low.. would only be around 0.5mm of parallel sided port in there (after the entry porting).
    Yep, that would get my vote.
    THE BOINGER BASH AT QUIGLEY HOLLOW. MAKING GREAT MEMORIES SINCE 15th JUNE, 2013.
    NEXT EVENT :- August 3/4, 2024.........BOING!!

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Retford, Notts
    Posts
    35,226
    Guys, maybe not the right place, and maybe a curveball,

    But.......Are there any situations where a LONGER transfer port can actually be beneficial? I accept that shorter ports indeed seem to result in higher efficiency, but would it be possible, for certain applications, that a longer port could improve the shot cycle and resultant smoothness, reduced recoil /surge??
    THE BOINGER BASH AT QUIGLEY HOLLOW. MAKING GREAT MEMORIES SINCE 15th JUNE, 2013.
    NEXT EVENT :- August 3/4, 2024.........BOING!!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •