Results 1 to 15 of 70

Thread: Will any springer ever beat the TX ?

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    middlesbrough
    Posts
    2,355
    Hmmm best springer whiscombe (not sure that I've spelled that right ) never owned one but I've shot someone else's, simply sublime. Or what about a venom lazaglided full custom job? Cooper Dan's upcoming wonder gun sounds rather nicer than the tx as well.

  2. #2
    Barryg's Avatar
    Barryg is offline Registered ̶D̶i̶a̶n̶a̶ User
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Nr. YEOVIL
    Posts
    5,073
    Quote Originally Posted by baldinio View Post
    Hmmm best springer whiscombe (not sure that I've spelled that right ) never owned one but I've shot someone else's, simply sublime. Or what about a venom lazaglided full custom job? Cooper Dan's upcoming wonder gun sounds rather nicer than the tx as well.
    But these are now collectors guns apart from the upcoming wounder gun and will it be readily available

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Dudley
    Posts
    9,323

    Tx200

    I dare say it will not be bettered? But is it better than a 77k / 97k? We may have reached the point of diminishing returns. A few years ago Airgunner tested Steve Popes wonder lever the VM3. Due to unforeseen circumstances the rifle was put on hold. Fingers crossed this rifle makes it one day to production? Mach 1.5
    Last edited by Mach 1.5; 11-07-2020 at 07:19 PM.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Swansea
    Posts
    5,070
    Rather the more open loading port of the 77/97. I have a tx200sr bullpup so i do know about the tx. But i prefer the 77 out of the lot.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Location
    Aberdeen
    Posts
    653
    I’m going to run for cover after this post.

    The ratcheting of the anti-bear trap irritates me to an irrational degree. Besides I have my own silent anti-bear trap - holding on to the cocking lever! Even when firing guns with an anti-bear trap I still hold on, I don’t trust the ratchet not to slip.

  6. #6
    JerryD is offline Will only use cherry lipbalm
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Oakham, Rutland
    Posts
    2,935
    Got the PE, PS, TX and HW

    ProSport: best balance of all of them, I've never found it particularly hold-sensitive, underlever is only a pain when not using a glove. Auto ABT and any pellets dropped in the loading chamber fall through.

    TX: more front-heavy, the damn safety/ABT pisses me off after using the PS. Mine's a Mk3HC with Mk1/2 internals, so a bit hybrid.

    HW: mine's tuned to buggery so sublime to shoot. Worst to load with the off centre (high) load position, but a bigger cutout. Trigger is the nicest of all of them, but I've buggered about with it a bit to get it like that, such as fit a TX style trigger blade.

    PE: lovely soft shot cycle with the 25mm conversion, easiest to load but it's a heavy old bugger! Very front-end heavy as well, but easy off an FT style shooting position.

    It's splitting hairs as to which is best, and none of mine are in standard stocks - the closest is the TX but that has an adjustable cheekpiece. The AA as standard are glided actions: HWs need tuning to get to the same level, but once tuned are on a par. I think the best improvement to feel and control is putting any of these actions into a target-style stock with upright pistol grip like the CS800. If AA or HW did this they'd be onto winners.



    .
    Jerry

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    sheffield
    Posts
    6,699

    Thumbs up

    I had to sell my .177" TX200 as my arthritic fingers had to hard of a job loading the pellet through the insanely small port, I dropped more pellets and had to shake them out than the parson preached about! (Never had this problem with the HC I had in .22" so it must have been down to the pellet size or the fact that my digiots had stiffened up more since I had the HC)


    I bought a .177" HW97, There were no such problems as the portt was almost half of the cylinder!!

    I loved that TX too, The stock was the most comfy stock i'd ever shouldered with the cutout and palmswell on the grip- Found out after there was someone that opened them up to a similar size to the 97

    The TX had a basic beech stock but was in lovely condition..


    The 97 came on the plassie thumbhole stock which was also really comfy but 'Orrid to look at!!


    Had this lammy stock spare so I fitted it along with some brass..



    John
    for my gunz guitarz and bonzai, see here
    www.flickr.com/photos/8163995@N07/

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Farnborough
    Posts
    4,406
    I had a left handed TX200HC for a while but sold it on after finding I preferred shooting a fellow club members standard HW97k. So I think the HW97K is better.
    Rich.
    WANTED: Next weeks winning lottery numbers :-)

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    gateshead
    Posts
    24,420
    tx200 hc in 22 I loved mine but with arthritis in my hands it got to heavy for me,and loading it was a right pain

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Retford, Notts
    Posts
    35,223
    Quote Originally Posted by Mach 1.5 View Post
    A few years ago Airgunner tried Steve Popes wonder lever the VM3. Due to unforeseen circumstances the rifle was put on hold. Fingers crossed this rifle makes it one day to production? Mach 1.5
    Yummy! Yes please!
    THE BOINGER BASH AT QUIGLEY HOLLOW. MAKING GREAT MEMORIES SINCE 15th JUNE, 2013.
    NEXT EVENT :- August 3/4, 2024.........BOING!!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •