Results 1 to 15 of 70

Thread: Retained energy - .22 vs .177

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    East Sussex, Nr Rye
    Posts
    17,270
    If you make a perfect brain shot, or a perfect under the wing pit on pigeon shot, then what pellet is irrelevant at normal ranges. No pellet shape will make any difference to the outcome of poor shot placement. A .177 is marketably easier to get perfect shot placement due to its higher velocity over a .22. A .22 certainly sounds to give more wallop but if it doesn't hit the mark it won't do the job.

    So, use the most accurate and consistent pellet in your rifle, and make that one good shot of it.

    It really is as simple as that.
    Anything more is the fun of testing, just like testing the rest of your kit. Its part of the fun of the hobby and the results are fun too. The more confident and familiar with your kit the better you will be.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Pontypridd
    Posts
    1,835
    Quote Originally Posted by Muskett View Post
    If you make a perfect brain shot, or a perfect under the wing pit on pigeon shot, then what pellet is irrelevant at normal ranges. No pellet shape will make any difference to the outcome of poor shot placement. A .177 is marketably easier to get perfect shot placement due to its higher velocity over a .22. A .22 certainly sounds to give more wallop but if it doesn't hit the mark it won't do the job.

    So, use the most accurate and consistent pellet in your rifle, and make that one good shot of it.

    It really is as simple as that.
    Anything more is the fun of testing, just like testing the rest of your kit. Its part of the fun of the hobby and the results are fun too. The more confident and familiar with your kit the better you will be.
    Totally agree, shot placement is the critical factor, it is fun to mess about with this stuff and it dispels a lot of the myths that tend to spring up, so worth doing anyway, but yeah it's all for the fun of it.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Bristol
    Posts
    6,274
    Assume a pellet is just scaled up from .177 to .22
    Mass is proportional to cal^3
    Drag is proportional to frontal area * velocity ^2
    Frontal area is proportional to cal^2
    Velocity for a 12ftlb rifle is proportional to cal ^-3/2
    So Drag is proportional to cal^2 * (cal^-3/2)^2
    Or Drag is proportional to 1/cal
    Energy lost is Drag * distance travelled
    So the .177 loses energy 24% faster than a .22 initially.

    BB

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •