Results 1 to 15 of 41

Thread: which sidelever should i choose for a bullpup project?

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Location
    Largs
    Posts
    251
    52 has a barrel sleeve that could be removed to shed some weight, old T01 units have a metal foresight assembly as well, not sure about the newer ones. All those items will have been designed with FAC power in mind and placed to prevent muzzle flip, with our power levels and a sleeve down to 22mm I seriously doubt they are in any way necessary though they will have a dampening effect on recoil.

    Another contender, albeit one that's not particularly efficient, would be the Sterling HR81 with a compression tube and trigger modified to be shot "backwards" (would need customised sears which would be difficult to say the least as they are not small order) with a breech and barrel off the likes of a Crosman facing back down the way. Not easy by any means but do-able with the right tools.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Location
    beckenham
    Posts
    622
    Quote Originally Posted by Squirrelking View Post
    ...
    Another contender, albeit one that's not particularly efficient, would be the Sterling HR81 with a compression tube and trigger modified to be shot "backwards" (would need customised sears which would be difficult to say the least as they are not small order) with a breech and barrel off the likes of a Crosman facing back down the way. Not easy by any means but do-able with the right tools.
    Don't laugh. But I've actually got an HR81 which i bought new when they were introduced. Seduced by the concept of a 'bolt action'. Should have kept my Feinwerkbau 127 instead. Don't think I will be expending effort in trying to reinvent the HR81 though. It is a marmite gun, and even i'm not sure i like it.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Location
    Largs
    Posts
    251
    Quote Originally Posted by chieffool View Post
    Don't laugh. But I've actually got an HR81 which i bought new when they were introduced. Seduced by the concept of a 'bolt action'. Should have kept my Feinwerkbau 127 instead. Don't think I will be expending effort in trying to reinvent the HR81 though. It is a marmite gun, and even i'm not sure i like it.
    Not laughing, I got given one when the licensing came in up here and have to admit I really like it. Sure it's a bit rough and it's never going to be perfect but I have a thing for engineering oddities, would jump at a Park RH91/3 or a Parker-Hale Dragon given the chance. Once I have a bit more cash I have a whole list of oddities.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Bruton
    Posts
    6,595
    Quote Originally Posted by Squirrelking View Post
    Not laughing, I got given one when the licensing came in up here and have to admit I really like it. Sure it's a bit rough and it's never going to be perfect but I have a thing for engineering oddities, would jump at a Park RH91/3 or a Parker-Hale Dragon given the chance. Once I have a bit more cash I have a whole list of oddities.
    Agreed. I also like oddities. I have an HR81, and a Dragon.

    Nice curiosities, and not terrible, but, frankly, poor rifles.
    Last edited by Geezer; 31-08-2018 at 09:23 PM. Reason: Spelling and going to bed now

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    Dunstable
    Posts
    10,421
    Been drawing and measuring what do you think?

    My idea https://imgur.com/gallery/aWGYf96
    them there springer's are soooooo addictive

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Location
    beckenham
    Posts
    622
    Quote Originally Posted by joffy View Post
    Been drawing and measuring what do you think?

    My idea https://imgur.com/gallery/aWGYf96
    I think we are of a similar approach - though mine is just on the back of an envelope at the moment. I think I'm aiming for less wood - more 'stripped down'.

    Based on a suggestion from another member, i'll probably cut out a model of the action in MDF (i tend to have quite a lot of offcuts around the workshop), and then work on the outline of the stock to accept it to see how it fits. The Donor is hopefully going to be an Air Arms sidelever that Binners has suggested when I see him at Kempton end September.

    https://drive.google.com/open?id=1vK...iC8UnrjLa8-raL

    (Could you access the link?)

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    Dunstable
    Posts
    10,421

    Thumbs up

    Quote Originally Posted by chieffool View Post
    I think we are of a similar approach - though mine is just on the back of an envelope at the moment. I think I'm aiming for less wood - more 'stripped down'.

    Based on a suggestion from another member, i'll probably cut out a model of the action in MDF (i tend to have quite a lot of offcuts around the workshop), and then work on the outline of the stock to accept it to see how it fits. The Donor is hopefully going to be an Air Arms sidelever that Binners has suggested when I see him at Kempton end September.

    https://drive.google.com/open?id=1vK...iC8UnrjLa8-raL

    (Could you access the link?)
    The hardest part for me is trying to use all the Diana mounting points even the abt mount to fix the trigger to so I keep the abt ...I'm making up the trigger blade out of three bits of aluminium so the middle piece mounts the trigger rod
    them there springer's are soooooo addictive

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •