Of course I refer to performance. What other reason would there be to buy or choose any piece of equipment over another if not based on it's performance?
That is my point 
& in my experience cheap mounts are crap so I refuse to use them.
Wow... Really?... "we don't buy cheap purely because they're cheap regardless how they shoot"? - Says it all to me and I imagine this biased thinking is applied by most brand conscious consumers. Is this logic regularly applied when purchasing the expensive branded scope mount? I think it could well be so.
Why is it biased? why would anyone buy cheap just because they're cheap even when knowing they shoot crap ?? every piece of advice re pellets is stick with known good quality brands JSB, AA, H&N, Bisley etc
Strange how some folk interpret things. Nope... I'm saying what's wrong with cheap if it does a good job and... Why buy expensive if cheap does the job? That was all. Your statement above suggests you seem to me saying buy expensive purely because it's expensive... utterly barmy! That's not a reason that's market conditioning.
No, I & others buy brands which we know to be good quality, rather than take a chance on some no-name rubbish just because no-name is cheap.
Not sure what you're saying here. Are you suggesting that through testing you have come across a mount (expensive?) that removes this lateral movement or that some (cheaper?) cause it?
Both
I'm interested to know if throughout all your tests, whether you ever came across an expensive / branded mount that didn't perform well or caused any misalignment? or does the fact that a mount costing a considerable amount of dosh remove all probability of any manufacturing faults or imperfections?
Over to you..
Originally Posted by rabbitslayer
Of course I refer to performance. What other reason would there be to buy or choose any piece of equipment over another if not based on it's performance?
Reply With Quote