Results 1 to 14 of 14

Thread: Do any of you chaps know what the difference...

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Leicester
    Posts
    12,379
    if memory serves me right the stock on the super is slightly different and the cylinder has meteor super on it iirc.

  2. #2
    sparko is offline One of Tiger Woods' lovers...
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Deepest Somerset, Glastonbury way
    Posts
    2,749

    Wink

    The only differences are In the stock...Having a rubber butt pad, right handed cheekpiece, and the woodwork Is `heavier `at the forend, I have and have had a number of these and cant say I have seen one with `Super Meteor`engraved In the receiver, but anything can happen...Sparko...X

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Amlwch, Anglesey
    Posts
    30,416
    Quote Originally Posted by benchstop View Post
    ...but I always thought that a super meteor was a meteor in a slightly better stock I thinking back to 1978/79 though.

    Mike
    Quote Originally Posted by ikarma70 View Post
    if memory serves me right the stock on the super is slightly different and the cylinder has meteor super on it iirc.
    Thanks chaps, then this looks to be a made up of a bit of mix up of parts as this one doesn't have 'super' on the cylinder.

    Ah well, a tiny bit of work and it'll shoot, so still good for £15

    EDIT:

    Quote Originally Posted by sparko View Post
    The only differences are In the stock...Having a rubber butt pad, right handed cheekpiece, and the woodwork Is `heavier `at the forend, I have and have had a number of these and cant say I have seen one with `Super Meteor`engraved In the receiver, but anything can happen...Sparko...X
    Hmm, the plot thickens, this does seem to have a 'chunkier' style stock. I'll post a pic up in a few minutes so that you chaps can look for yourselves.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Amlwch, Anglesey
    Posts
    30,416
    Here's a pic of it.

  5. #5
    Gareth W-B's Avatar
    Gareth W-B is offline Retired Mod & Airgun Anorak Extraordinaire
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Near(ish) Chelmsford
    Posts
    26,446
    Hi Steve, the Super Meteor stock has a fitted black rubber recoil pad, whereas the standard Meteor stock of the day was plain wood but with ribs machined into the end of the butt to help it stay at the shoulder . Atb: Gareth W-B.
    _______________________________________________

    Done my bit for the BBS: http://www.airgunbbs.com/showthread....-being-a-mod-… now I’m a game-keeper turned poacher.

  6. #6
    Jim145 is offline I've decided not to touch mine...
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Wakefield, W.Yorks
    Posts
    799
    I've a Super, bought new by my brother and it only has meteor on the cylinder. Thats a super stock on yours, though looks like it may have been re-finished at some time. Bargain for £15!

  7. #7
    steiner Guest

    Smile "Air Guns On Test" circa 1980

    I`m sitting here with a copy of an Airgun World special from 1980.The test written up on the Super Meteor says that the only difference between it and a standard Meteor is it`s de luxe Stock and ventelated black rubber recoil pad.

    Trigger pull is given as a "fairly harsh" 4 lbs,M.V. in 0.177(on test) 655 fps ,with Besa(?) pellets.It is also described as having a semi-matt black painted finish, rather than bluing and the beech stock has a darkish brown appearance.List price is £44.50 (although Gentry`s,in Welling ,Kent only charged £37.80!)

    Hope this helps

    Kenny

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Amlwch, Anglesey
    Posts
    30,416
    Again thanks for the all info chaps. Much appreciated. It doesn't need much to get it working, so I couldn't pass up on it for £15 could I.

  9. #9
    Hsing-ee's Avatar
    Hsing-ee is offline may also be employed in conjunction with a drawn reciprocation dingle arm, to reduce sinusoidal repleneration
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Glasgow
    Posts
    18,271
    Quote Originally Posted by Punchsteve View Post
    Again thanks for the all info chaps. Much appreciated. It doesn't need much to get it working, so I couldn't pass up on it for £15 could I.
    They are bonnie little rifles, I will never sell mine. One thing to watch for is that overtightening the fore-end stock screws will pull the breech jaws apart, causing wobbly barrel syndrome. You can replace the breech pin with the bolt from a Merc-S with a bit of fettling if it becomes an issue. The design is very efficient at turning spring power into muzzle energy, my .22 will do 10 ft/lbs with a standard spring. It's a very cheap design but works extremely well, the only real downside is its rather stiff trigger.

    How is that Merc-S I sold you getting along?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •