Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: sighting in technique

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Raymond Terrace
    Posts
    87

    sighting in technique

    I DO have some trouble sighting in sometimes, and Ill think up an idea, then take for ever to try it.

    Today I was aiming at a target and decided to shoot at my last pellet hole. And then shoot at the next hole and then shoot at the next hole.

    Well I found this method left a string of holes creeping across the target to the left and I would never have seen it, maybe I should notice a tendancy to group left but some land left, some land right, but tend left and its hard to see.

    I then clicked it ONE click anti clockwise at a time until the creep slowed and stopped.

    Try this method, aim at each subsequent hole and see it it strings left or right and make small adjustments.

    And I tried it since posting and shot my best groups ever with this Crusader!!!! (about 1'' at 37 metres) and it seemed far easier to keep it up, heres hoping it keeps up.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Kingston
    Posts
    2,282
    Hi Ken
    Not saying this didnt work for you in this instance but I can't see that this works any better than letting off two or three shots at one aiming point, seeing what the group is like, then adjusting accordingly.

    The problem with taking a different aiming point each time is that you're introducing more variables i.e. changing your body and rifle position, whereas aiming at one point at least cuts down the variables as much as possible and should give you a better idea of where your sights are set to hit.

  3. #3
    clunge is offline Buys suspicious amounts of hand sanitiser
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Stafford
    Posts
    385
    I started using the same method a couple of months ago. Works well for me.

    Furthermore, I zero to 20 yards, so If I do a string of five, then the click calculation stops being a calculation.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Crawley
    Posts
    112
    I am VERY new to shooting with a scope (only got my rifle on Friday) and during my research, somehting like the OP's experience was given as a good sighting method if you have a means to hold the rifle still. Aim centre. Shoot. WIHTOUT moving the rifle, realign the scope to the pellet hole, which should account for the drift or aligment diffence.

    Any comments before I see if this works for myself?

    Regards

    Mark
    Some air, some section 2 and a growing collection of section 1. Boy, this FAC stuff is addictive!

  5. #5
    magicniner is offline The Posh Knocking Shop Artist Formerly Known as Nocturnal Nick
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Rotherham
    Posts
    5,314
    I mainly shoot conventional paper with open sights so aiming at a pellet hole isn't an option as the sight picture is the black circle of the target over a the front sight with a small light gap.
    If you're using optics use a rest for a shot then with the pistol firmly held pointing at your aim point adjust the sight to point at the hit point,
    Regards,
    Nick
    Airgun Repairs, Bespoke Airgun Smithing and Precision Engineering Services
    http://www.magic9designltd.com

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Mersea Island Colchester Essex
    Posts
    176

    sighting in

    Hi Ken,
    Can't quite see the advantage in your system of shooting at your last hole and then altering the turret, how do you account for flyers? you could be chasing the holes all over the target, the tried and tested way over the years is to shoot a group and then move the group.
    But to each his own....I'm always trying new things but take notice of the old stuff that works.
    Another Ken

  7. #7
    Parabuteo is offline My Chrony has bought it a couple of times...
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Southampton
    Posts
    6,061
    Quote Originally Posted by clunge View Post
    I started using the same method a couple of months ago. Works well for me.

    Furthermore, I zero to 20 yards, so If I do a string of five, then the click calculation stops being a calculation.
    Why?

    A minute of angle is a minute of angle at any range, you just need to work out how much it is. I spent ages trying to work out how many clicks I needed at 300...all i had to do was look at plot sheet...look at turret...dial...job jobbed.

    How are 10m rifles calibrated? Still in MOA I am guessing

    If 1MOA is 1.074"at 100 (approx) then it will be half that at 50, quarter at 25 and so on (although we round it down to an inch, so already there are inaccuracies).

    The MOA is a constant angle, wind/inaccuracies aside, it only subtends with distance.

    If you need 4 clicks per MOA at 100, then 4 clicks at 25 is 1/4MOA or 16 clicks per inch if you like...at 20yards it wont be far off, certainly enough to get your MPI within a pellets width of the POA.

    Or use the 25yd settings and fine tune.

    If all you are doing is zeroing, you dont even really need a 5 round group, 3 will do as long as they land close enough to be a group

    Another quick/rough zero method you could use with a scope that needs no knowledge of the MOA at all is an old snipers trick called the 2 round zero.

    You need a steady base though.

    Fire 2 shots using dead centre as a POA.

    Keep the crosshairs on the POA, and wind the turrets until the cross hairs lie on the holes. now, when you put the cross hairs back on the POA, you have taken the error out visually rather than mathematically....but you do need to be able to keep the rifle still as if it moves....
    I'm a maggot in another life you know

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •