I think your derogatory comment is unwarranted!
I sent you two e-mails...both were polite. In one of the e-mails I attached copies of Home Office documentation that I thought would be of interest to you.
E-mail 1
Hello Tac,
I hope you do not mind me contacting you directly instead of using
Airgun BBS?
I cannot upload jpegs so I have to do it this way as the document I
have has been scanned as a picture file rather than a text file.
I have attached an extract of the list of obsolete calibre's (page 9),
which may be of interest?
The calibre in question is the Martini 45/577. They have it listed as
the 577/45. (I always put the calibre first, it seems to make more
sense that way).
Regards
E-mail 2
Hello Tac,
The problem seems to be that your reply to my thread states that I
would be breaking the law if I had a 577/450 without an FAC. It has
been in the list of obsolete caibres since 2001.
I have copied the relevant page into a word doc and will post it on BBS
for the benefit of other people.
All the best
Enfield2band.
I see nothing untoward here!
If anyone on BBS can I would be grateful if they would point it out!