It will be very interesting to compare Diana 35 and 34 vital statistics, has anyone do this?
Always looking for any cheap, interesting, knackered "project" guns. Thanks, JB.
It will be very interesting to compare Diana 35 and 34 vital statistics, has anyone do this?
But what is the fun in that? Dont we all have at least one HW30 already?
In my mind, the Diana 35 has a timeless classic look and feel, it is somewhat of an archetype of what I feel an air rifle should be, both in looks and apperance. Plus, a soft shooting 10fpe rifle is better than a slammy 8fpe rifle ;-)
Too many airguns!
The main issue with the 35 is the short compression stroke. If the swept volume remained the same, but the bore was 25mm, the stroke would be 85mm, exactly the same as my and a few HFT competitors' rifles, which have no problem achieving satisfactory muzzle energy.
The length of the transfer port is not ideal, but it's not a huge issue - the LGV port is longer and the rifle easily achieves our legal limit and 15 ft. lb. in export markets. I agree it's too wide as it was set for a dieseling rifle, and ~3mm would be a better option.
One thing I don't think anyone has mentioned is the available space for the mainspring. If there isn't enough length for a modest rate spring with bags of preload (best energy efficiency and lowest recoil acceleration), then increasing muzzle energy necessitates a stiffer spring, which increases recoil acceleration (increased hold sensitivity and a nasty snappy recoil cycle), and also increases piston bounce.
I could not agree with you more.
As a kid back in the '80s I came very close in acquiring a brand new one in 0.177 cal but never made it. Therefore this rifle remained to haunt my dreams until this day.
I managed to own newer and better quality spring airguns but the "bug" is still alive and i think it will follow me to the very end of my days.
It Was 200g.
I have changed the seal with a Diana 34 model and fitted because it was too tight until the piston nearly move down it's own weight .A nylon ring at the rear end, lube with a mix of molybden , graphite and motor oil.
Nice result with jsb exact : 13,8 J ,regular speed within 3m/s variation
A picture of the 50 year old Lady after some little lifting :
https://imagizer.imageshack.com/img923/2097/ODoWhY.jpg
200g sounds light enough to support a slightly larger port than would normally be optimal for a 28mm bored gun...
Always looking for any cheap, interesting, knackered "project" guns. Thanks, JB.
Just been reading this thread & found it very interesting. Just wondering about the above ref To the 35b as supposedly being a bit more powerful than (standard?) model 35, which I hadn't heard before. I had thought the 35b was a bit like the Meteor v Meteor Super. The 35b having a nicer stock with chequering, a moveable rear sight with clip on peep attachment & the four bladed rotating front sight, but I thought the guts were the same.
The E designation on the model 50 has sometimes been said to signify export, is that correct? So, does anyone know what the b designation & the s designation really mean? Or we're they just randomly chosen to differentiate a variation in the range.
Might be able to do some external measurements on a Pre war 35 a post war 35 & 35b if it's of help to anyone.
After a few hundred shots I tried the jsb exact 4.51 and these are the ones that give the best power with 15 joules (11 ft/lb)!
Looks like a good investment in time.. nice
Always looking for any cheap, interesting, knackered "project" guns. Thanks, JB.
Thats a very nice gun you have built, and some great shooting!
Too many airguns!