RWS Superfield Experience?

[R53BRG]

Afternoon all, what’s everyone’s experience with these? At circa £11.50 a tin in .22 I thought I’d put some trust in them having had good results with other RWS pellets and bought 2 tins. However, in my HW100 K atleast, they’re flying allover the place. Sometimes a good 6 inches away from where I’m aiming. I also thought I’d give Webley Accupell FT (H&N FTT in a frock) a try and the groupings were like chalk and cheese compared to the Superfield.

Thank you in advance!

[Dan Giliballs]

Given your gun and scope Is ok it looks like your gun does not like them, not uncommon for a rifle to be pellet fussy

[Murphy]

They started off great but they changed and went crap.

[Trumpetier]

I had some, grouped brilliantly out of my S200. Bought another tin, exactly the same numbers etc on the tin, grouped terrible.

[Frog]

My experience is adequate to down right awful....

[brk1]

They weren't the best in my Hw100 but also weren't terrible either, but my S510 which isn't really pellet fussy spat them everywhere , not to a 6" extent but they vertically strung with some good flyers over an 1" higher and an 1 1/2" low right as well so shall we say all inside a 3" group at fairly close quarters , if you watch Si Pittaway's (VerminhuntersTV) early review with his HW100 they were really spot on back then , think they changed them after that review to a different manufacturer. Since the change the ratings have certainly gone downhill , they are actually the worst pellet I've tried in my S510

[PCPShooter]

https://www.uttings.co.uk/p137065-rw...500-ra2421120/

These look interesting _

[Bellycrawler]

I've used them in a few different rifles. Weren't the best but certainly not the worst. As allways it's what your barrel.likes.

[R53BRG]

They weren't the best in my Hw100 but also weren't terrible either, but my S510 which isn't really pellet fussy spat them everywhere , not to a 6" extent but they vertically strung with some good flyers over an 1" higher and an 1 1/2" low right as well so shall we say all inside a 3" group at fairly close quarters , if you watch Si Pittaway's (VerminhuntersTV) early review with his HW100 they were really spot on back then , think they changed them after that review to a different manufacturer. Since the change the ratings have certainly gone downhill , they are actually the worst pellet I've tried in my S510

How did they load in your HW100? I believe the problem I’m having is they can almost jamb sometimes, and take extra force of the side leaver to get a pellet into the breach. They’re the ones that end up going horrendously off target, as I imagine some damage is being taken. When they load smoothly they group pretty well, but there’s no guessing when the next stiff jamb will be so pretty useless in this gun really.

I tried them in a Hatsan pistol afterwords, resting at 35 yards (lol) and managed to hit a beer can so they can’t be totally poo!

[robs5230]

They melt down to make good fishing weights and catapult ammo.

[Shed tuner]

just to prove the well known "if they suit your barrel" argument,, they are amazing in my JK Noblesse bullpup. Excellent accuracy out to 50 odd yards in .22 and most other stuff isn't very good.

[Geezer]

My stock of them is five or more years old, but I rate them as “pretty good”.

[Rob Taylor]

Used to be good. Very accurate in my 22 lightning. My tins were about 10 years old. Bought a new batch a couple of years ago, and they were dreadful in the same rifle. Looked shinier too so maybe a change in the manufacturing process.

[Murphy]

Used to be good. Very accurate in my 22 lightning. My tins were about 10 years old. Bought a new batch a couple of years ago, and they were dreadful in the same rifle. Looked shinier too so maybe a change in the manufacturing process.

At first they where just rebadged JSB's.

Now god knows who makes them.

[bill57]

My stock of them is five or more years old, but I rate them as “pretty good”.

Every pellet is "pretty good" - if it works in the rifle you're using.