Results 1 to 11 of 11

Thread: Advice wanted on how to recognise reproduction Webley Air Pistol boxes

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Bath, innit?
    Posts
    6,700
    Quote Originally Posted by Josie & John View Post
    Hi Vic,

    Check the corners inside and out. If they are stiff, chances are the box is a repro. The bases are usually not as well made as the lids and again are just too stiff and don't look 'right'.

    My worry is after several years of aging, these repro boxes may be passed off as genuine - I'm no fan of them.

    John
    They do need a discreet but obvious flaw in them don’t they? I’m sure it wouldn’t kill the look if they had a little date or something printed unobtrusively.
    Morally flawed

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jun 2000
    Location
    Basingstoke, U.K.
    Posts
    6,764
    Quote Originally Posted by Jerry Cornelius View Post
    They do need a discreet but obvious flaw in them don’t they? I’m sure it wouldn’t kill the look if they had a little date or something printed unobtrusively.
    Absolutely. I have a very well reproduced BSA brochure in my collection that is almost impossible to tell from an original other than a very discreet date and printing code in a bottom corner. I'm pleased whoever reproduced it was honest about it.

    A small code on a corner would be ideal if someone wants to reproduce ephemera and others want to buy it as that way, no-one is intentionally fooled.

    John
    Currently looking for Baikal Makarov pistols with the following prefixes to the serial number: 98, T01, T09, T21, T22
    Prefer boxed or cased but will consider loose examples too.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    cambridge
    Posts
    909
    I can see the reason for having something printed on the boxes to distinguish originals from modern ones. It seems reasonable to me, but what about other items such as modern made replacement parts that have been fitted to a rifle or pistol? Modern made trigger guards, sights etc., should these be marked up in some way to avoid confusion or deception?
    Last edited by trajectory; 09-08-2022 at 10:11 AM.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Bath, innit?
    Posts
    6,700
    Quote Originally Posted by trajectory View Post
    I can see the reason for having something printed on the boxes to distinguish originals from modern ones. It seems reasonable to me, but what about other items such as modern made replacement parts that have been fitted to a rifle or pistol? Modern made trigger guards, sights etc., should these be marked up in some way to avoid confusion or deception?
    Mmm. Triggers broom aside, an original gun with a replacement trigger guard is still an original gun in my view, albeit less desirable than one that is wholly original. But you have to be practical: I bought a webley service without an interceptor sear, which I then fitted. The part is too small to be marked in any way.

    A reproduction service .25 barrel ought to be marked though, imho. The possibility of deception and asking a higher price than the gun is worth is far greater.
    Morally flawed

  5. #5
    micky2 is offline The collector formerly known as micky
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Location
    boston
    Posts
    2,156
    It always amazes me how much restored motorbikes and cars go for.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •