Quote Originally Posted by angrybear View Post
Frankly, yes.

Joe public on the whole doesn't WANT to be educated, they have the opinion that has been drilled into them from birth, no matter what the subject, A is good - B is bad,
and the majority of people, on the majority of subjects, have little or no interest in having that opinion changed.
All they want to do is earn a living & sit watching brain numbing "reality TV"

IF you could introduce shooting sports at school level, then in a generation, opinions would change, as those kids learned it was an enjoyable sport,
but as that will never happen it relies on future shooters to learn through families, living in the country or joining the forces, there will always be a few newcomers, but the majority will have a link.
Well, in Victorian times shooting was followed almost as closely as Football. Many a pub had its Bell Target range. Shooting was seen as fun, plus the military was big. Many a school had a shooting range; my old school had two including the last 200m "tunnel" range.
Public interest can change/go in fashions. But the political lefty brigade are the ones that pushed the ban culture to the hilt. (Not helped by "I'm all right Jack" traditional shooters who didn't want change, and so long as it didn't effect them attitude.)

Yes, shooting sports does have to compete with all the other activities people enjoy. I just say shooting sports are fantastically good fun, for there is a shooting sport for everyone. From plinking in the back garden, to airsoft, to high peasant. FT/HFT too.