Results 1 to 15 of 28

Thread: Why did you choose

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    North Yorkshire
    Posts
    1,520

    Why did you choose

    Not a caliber debate...just interested to know why you decided to choose either .177 or .22 for general pest control

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Exeter
    Posts
    35,781
    Well, I dropped .177 after the number of rabbits cleanly head shot with it that still had a heartbeat when collected.
    I did hunt with .22 for a bit but then bought a .20 which is the perfect sub 12 general hunting calibre, backed up with both .22 & .25 sub-12 for close range ratting/barns.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Edinburgh
    Posts
    554
    .22 as that was the calibre most people used in my developmental years. My pal got a new BSA Mercury in .177 early 80s and we all had .22 so we all shared experience of the two calibres prevalent at the time. Never had a bias but have tended to buy and use .22 for pest control. If you know the capabilities and and limitations of the pellet and what pushes it, combined with being able to consistently hit the humane kill area, those are the critical considerations. Used a .177 Theoben for rabbit control on a farm a while back and that was exceptional. Have never had the opportunity to learn and try .20 or .25.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Retford, Notts
    Posts
    35,075
    Quote Originally Posted by foby75 View Post
    .22 as that was the calibre most people used in my developmental years. My pal got a new BSA Mercury in .177 early 80s and we all had .22 so we all shared experience of the two calibres prevalent at the time. Never had a bias but have tended to buy and use .22 for pest control. If you know the capabilities and and limitations of the pellet and what pushes it, combined with being able to consistently hit the humane kill area, those are the critical considerations. Used a .177 Theoben for rabbit control on a farm a while back and that was exceptional. Have never had the opportunity to learn and try .20 or .25.
    I haven't hunted for years now but when I did, I mainly used .22 for the same reasons. These days, if I were to hunt again, I'd be more than happy to use any of the four calibres mentioned and accuracy / shot placement is king. Affordability and choice would probably steer me more towards the two longer established favourites.
    THE BOINGER BASH AT QUIGLEY HOLLOW. MAKING GREAT MEMORIES SINCE 15th JUNE, 2013.
    NEXT EVENT :- May 4/5, 2024.........BOING!!

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Location
    Melton Mowbray
    Posts
    2,025
    I use both. Mostly .22 at the moment.
    I use .25 in barns for pigeons sometimes.
    Repariere nicht, was nicht kaputtist.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    gateshead
    Posts
    24,314
    i use 22 mainly because i was getting fly offs with 177

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    redcar
    Posts
    884
    .177 as it is accuracy that kills and not calibre. If you upscale the ".177 to rabbit ratio" to human size then the calibre equivalent is about an "inch". So .177 is more than big enough, does enough damage but is naturally more accurate simply because of its dimensions.
    I don't like the explanation "if I'm a bit off the larger calibre still does the job", only my opinion mind but you shouldn't accept being "a bit off" when it comes to live quarry. Paper or metal targets don't suffer.
    Accuracy is king, full stop, so the best hunting pellet is the tightest grouping pellet in real world conditions in the most accurate calibre.
    Of course, if the mark can be hit every time then calibre is irrelevant from .177 to .30 and beyond but generally at varying ranges and at sub 12 most people will shoot tighter groups with a .177 than the other calibres.
    VAYA CON DIOS

  8. #8
    barrel's Avatar
    barrel is offline Work is the refuge of people who have nothing better to do
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Edinburgh
    Posts
    9,045
    Quote Originally Posted by knightrider View Post
    Not a caliber debate...just interested to know why you decided to choose either .177 or .22 for general pest control
    Sounds like a caliber debate to me

    Kindest regards

    Barrel
    IF I WALKED ON WATER PEOPLE WOULD SAY I COULD NOT SWIM !

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    mountain ash
    Posts
    8,642
    For me its distance shooting , Normally shoot between 50 and 90 yards so .22 not much use for my shooting.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Exeter
    Posts
    35,781
    Quote Originally Posted by madcarlos View Post
    For me its distance shooting , Normally shoot between 50 and 90 yards so .22 not much use for my shooting.
    Well I'd say sub12 air is not much use at those ranges full stop.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    warminster
    Posts
    469
    .177 for me .Hunting as it is more forgiven if you have the range slightly out but still in your PBR
    I often have to thread a pellet through gaps in branches and twigs and is much easier with the less curved trajectory of the .177 .
    But this isn’t a calibre debate , is it !!

  12. #12
    Murphy is offline Cooee! Chase me you naughty boys!
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Wigan
    Posts
    22,388
    My first ever air rifle was .177 my last air rifle was .177.
    Master Debater

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Near Wimbledon, SW London, or Lusaka, Zambia
    Posts
    26,444
    Quote Originally Posted by angrybear View Post
    Well I'd say sub12 air is not much use at those ranges full stop.
    indeed.... only takes a gnat's fart to push your pellet 6" off...
    Always looking for any cheap, interesting, knackered "project" guns. Thanks, JB.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Hounslow.
    Posts
    4,033
    Quote Originally Posted by knightrider View Post
    Not a caliber debate...just interested to know why you decided to choose either .177 or .22 for general pest control
    Probably to do with time, when you started airgun shooting. Years ago, airguns weren't looked upon as ' weapon's of mass destruction ', and was a natural progression from a catapult for the pre teens youngster. Often you would shoot with a mate and if you had a different calibre to his, it could if been down to who had most kills. This alone would influence your choice of your next gun. Also, as time goes by, practice takes a part in tuning to skills. Imagine a coke can as the target. Shoot it with a .177 and more often than not, the pellet would go through the front and back, with a tiny hole in it. Now shoot a coke can with a .22 The rumpled can show what a .22 will do. Isn't that enough persuasion to the upcoming shooter ?
    And so your calibre debate starts.
    Last edited by where's it gone; 08-12-2022 at 05:25 PM.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Dorset
    Posts
    2,871
    .20 never gets a look in because most people have never tried this cal and the economics of this pellet means it's limited in pellet choice and only H&N hold the key to a better choice of pellets.

    JSB for some strange reason are 5.1 mm and a tad to heavy

    Yet a 10 grain or there about's .20 pellet which has been made by H&N in the pass really is the dogs
    Hw77+7

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •