Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 31 to 45 of 46

Thread: Longbow v Tomahawk

  1. #31
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Portsmouth
    Posts
    2,718

    After A search........

    I have found myself a nice .177 Longbow

    SWEET

    I really like it but for something with the name Longbow I thought it was a bit er, well Short?

    Really liking it thanks for all the guys who provided some info.

    I guess I now need to look out for a TX QyangYong Tombow at the right price and we will all be laughing
    If it has a trigger, I'm gonna enjoy it!

  2. #32
    Murphy is offline Cooee! Chase me you naughty boys!
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Wigan
    Posts
    22,388
    I’ve not shot mine in a while! Might put a few through it later in the week.
    Master Debater

  3. #33
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Location
    Winchester, UK
    Posts
    15,366
    The Longbow was directly developed from the Tomahawk.
    My Webley contact, who was involved in it's development, still has one of the Longbow prototypes.
    I had a boxed Tomahawk and Longbow with several stocks, plus a Venom Longbow, all sold to a keen collector in 2014/15, and he still has them.

  4. #34
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Bruton
    Posts
    6,593
    If (as above) they were equivalents to the HW80 and 99, just with better stocks and a less annoying safety catch, it’s a dratted shame that Webley never made an HW85/95 equivalent of the design. 7.5lbs, 42” long, potential for 14-15 ft/lbs, but comfy at 11. The Omega was a great “Webley FWB Sport” but the Tombow/Longhawk could have been even better. Just that Webley was falling apart at the time, and almost no-one was buying quality springers as opposed to PCPs.

  5. #35
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Retford, Notts
    Posts
    35,059
    Quote Originally Posted by English View Post
    I have found myself a nice .177 Longbow:
    Excellent. Enjoy.
    THE BOINGER BASH AT QUIGLEY HOLLOW. MAKING GREAT MEMORIES SINCE 15th JUNE, 2013.
    NEXT EVENT :- May 4/5, 2024.........BOING!!

  6. #36
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Dudley
    Posts
    9,292

    Webley

    Webley never made an HW85/95 equivalent of the design. 7.5lbs, 42” long, potential for 14-15 ft/lbs, but comfy at 11..

    Ivan and Steve wanted to build one but the webley management had other ideas. The venom team wanted to build a Springer bigger than a longbow and smaller than a Tommie but management wouldn't listen.

    Mach 1.5

  7. #37
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Dorset
    Posts
    2,871
    Quote Originally Posted by Mach 1.5 View Post
    Webley never made an HW85/95 equivalent of the design. 7.5lbs, 42” long, potential for 14-15 ft/lbs, but comfy at 11..

    Ivan and Steve wanted to build one but the webley management had other ideas. The venom team wanted to build a Springer bigger than a longbow and smaller than a Tommie but management wouldn't listen.

    Mach 1.5
    Webley could have been world leaders with the design team they had, which may have even shook up Hw into making new designs.

    The spring gun world has become stagnant of new design quality rifles.

    A mag fed Webley Eclipse is now nothing but wishful thinking/day dreaming.

    And I've still yet to see even just as design drawing, Steve Pope's VM3R, I wonder who holds them now ?
    Last edited by HW777; 26-04-2023 at 04:42 PM. Reason: Correction
    Hw77+7

  8. #38
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Location
    Winchester, UK
    Posts
    15,366
    Quote Originally Posted by Mach 1.5 View Post

    Ivan and Steve wanted to build one but the webley management had other ideas. The venom team wanted to build a Springer bigger than a longbow and smaller than a Tommie but management wouldn't listen.

    Mach 1.5
    I can't see point in that as the Longbow was developed by Webley from the Tomahawk.
    I know my Webley contact was accompanied by Steve to Hatsan in Turkey when a new rifle was being planned, but nothing ever came of it.

  9. #39
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Dudley
    Posts
    9,292

    Tommy

    The idea was to build a longbow with a cylinder about an inch longer than the production version but Webley wouldn't listen and so hence Webley developed the Longbow that went into production, after all, what did Ivan and Steve know? To get the best out of a longbow TopDog and Steve longstroked it to produce a nicer shooting rifle in .177.
    It took a shoot off in the Webley factory to convince the Webley management that LW barrels were better than Webley, hence the LW barrels used on later webley's as they admitted defeat on that one.
    The VM3 is mentioned and featured in Airgunner November 2007. The VM3R would have shaken the Springer world up for sure..I had the pleasure of shooting it and it really would have caused a stir. Mach 1.5
    Last edited by Mach 1.5; 26-04-2023 at 04:42 PM.

  10. #40
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Location
    Winchester, UK
    Posts
    15,366
    Thanks for that, Paul.
    I wonder if my Venom Longbow was a long stroked version ? I have photographs of it but can't find a serial number. It had one of the best stocks I've ever seen on a Longbow.

    I've now found the serial numbers of my Longbows and Stingrays:

    .177 Venom Longbow 929121
    .177 Longbow 925693
    .177 Longbow 933900

    .177 Venom Stingray 898749

    SFS 001 .177 Stingray 898788
    Last edited by Troubledshooter; 27-04-2023 at 03:33 PM. Reason: Additional Info.

  11. #41
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Retford, Notts
    Posts
    35,059
    Quote Originally Posted by Mach 1.5 View Post
    Webley never made an HW85/95 equivalent of the design. 7.5lbs, 42” long, potential for 14-15 ft/lbs, but comfy at 11..

    Ivan and Steve wanted to build one but the webley management had other ideas. The venom team wanted to build a Springer bigger than a longbow and smaller than a Tommie but management wouldn't listen.

    Mach 1.5
    Quote Originally Posted by Mach 1.5 View Post
    The idea was to build a longbow with a cylinder about an inch longer than the production version but Webley wouldn't listen and so hence Webley developed the Longbow that went into production, after all, what did Ivan and Steve know? To get the best out of a longbow TopDog and Steve longstroked it to produce a nicer shooting rifle in .177.
    It took a shoot off in the Webley factory to convince the Webley management that LW barrels were better than Webley, hence the LW barrels used on later webley's as they admitted defeat on that one.
    The VM3 is mentioned and featured in Airgunner November 2007. The VM3R would have shaken the Springer world up for sure..I had the pleasure of shooting it and it really would have caused a stir. Mach 1.5
    So sad. Just think what may have been.
    THE BOINGER BASH AT QUIGLEY HOLLOW. MAKING GREAT MEMORIES SINCE 15th JUNE, 2013.
    NEXT EVENT :- May 4/5, 2024.........BOING!!

  12. #42
    Join Date
    Mar 2001
    Location
    Kettering, Northants, england
    Posts
    3,321
    I am lucky enough to have two Birmingham Longbows. One in .177 with a nice walnut stock and the other in .22 with a beech stock. Both really nice to shoot. I think the .22 is my favourite, but both have nice triggers and are pretty accurate rifles.
    I have met and dealt with Topdog, he is a very clever chap and most helpful with any problems.

  13. #43
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Location
    Winchester, UK
    Posts
    15,366
    I've now found the serial numbers and added them to post#40.

  14. #44
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Dudley
    Posts
    9,292

    Webley Longbow

    The longstroked Longbow was a VMach conversion and not a Webley Venom. So unless Steve did the conversation then it will not be a longstroke conversion by him. Not many where converted to the 6mm stroke to be honest. Mach 1.5

  15. #45
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Retford, Notts
    Posts
    35,059
    Quote Originally Posted by archie View Post
    I have met and dealt with Topdog, he is a very clever chap and most helpful with any problems.
    Quote Originally Posted by Mach 1.5 View Post
    Just heard the very sad news my dear friend David has passed away. His knowledge on the science of airguns was second to none and it was always a pleasure to be in his company. He would blind me with science on how air rifles worked when ever we had a catch up.My sincere condolences go to his family and friends. RIP My dear friend. Hope God as a longbow cause with you and Steve he'll be in for a treat.
    Mach 1.5
    Very sadly, as above.
    THE BOINGER BASH AT QUIGLEY HOLLOW. MAKING GREAT MEMORIES SINCE 15th JUNE, 2013.
    NEXT EVENT :- May 4/5, 2024.........BOING!!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •