Results 1 to 15 of 19

Thread: The Britannia could only have originated in England- what a insane piece of machinery

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Location
    Wooster
    Posts
    3,532

    The Britannia could only have originated in England- what a insane piece of machinery

    My Time Machine got a little rusty with this one but very cool anyway. Looks all original with the second type rear sight? Below are way too many pics as usual but this one deserves it. Unbelievable design, so complicated and well executed. I’m putting my favorite picture below and then a link to more. Shoots reliably but doubt it’s up to full power which is fine for my purposes. (I not out to rival Matt in his exploits!) It was his awesome videos that hooked me.



    Link:

    https://imgur.com/a/mWQkSk5

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    cambridge
    Posts
    909
    Well you may have a point, Webley Fosbery, the Highest Possible, Mars pistol by Gabbet-Fairfax, they spring to mind, yes theres some odd machinery about, quite a bit of still works though

    Your example of the Britannia looks really nice, reckon you will get a good bit of enjoyment from being the new custodian. Atb

  3. #3
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Saxmundham
    Posts
    1,510
    Why complicated? Every feature that is needed to make a fine air rifle is there in simple form. They are one of the most compact serious air rifles made and even if re-made today would attract a large market, with a trigger revised to suit todays tastes.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Location
    Wooster
    Posts
    3,532
    Quote Originally Posted by greenwayjames View Post
    Why complicated? Every feature that is needed to make a fine air rifle is there in simple form. They are one of the most compact serious air rifles made and even if re-made today would attract a large market, with a trigger revised to suit todays tastes.

    I hear you but certainly complicated compared to what would be the American “carbine” of the early 20th century. I post the Britannia on my American vintage site and they are taken back by all the pieces and parts in motion. Been shooting it today and it’s hitting pretty hard with good accuracy but my 2nd series rear sight is pretty poor? Very wide V. I can see why they quickly developed their 3rd and fully adjustable one. Would love to test that sight or an aperture sight on it. Mine would be no match for my 1919 BSA Light with factory aperture or the aperture sighted Crosman below? But this is 1905. It is an amazing piece of machinery.

    Last edited by 45flint; 30-04-2023 at 07:18 PM.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Bordon Hants
    Posts
    655
    Looking for a Britannia myself. One will come up one day, so not in a rush. Seen some crap restored ones for silly money, just because the are in a rare calibre or just a Britannia, wont be fooled at silly prices. Enjoy your new purchase, very nice bit of kit.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Feb 2017
    Location
    London
    Posts
    1,571
    Hi Steve,
    Looking through your pictures it seems you have got a really nice example.

    Your rearsight is probably rarer than the later Bonehill patent adjustable one you usually see, it must be early 1905.
    I have a flip up type two leaf sight that was on a much later ‘Anglo sureshot’ marked Britannia sn.1153. (probably) late 1905

    Interestingly yours has a very similarly shaped adjustment wheel to the later micrometer rearsight, and I really like the height adjustment marks on the back of the sight.

    Also your Britannia has the best example of the Britannia stamp I’ve seen. I thought they all thinned out in the centre of the stamp due to wear on the stamp used, or perhaps the shape of the flat that was being stamped. Yours is uniformly deep, maybe indicative of an early example that was stamped with a fresh tool.

    I think it has not been messed with, rubbed down or refinished like so many have.
    It seems to have plenty of original finish remaining, personally I wouldn’t do anything to it beyond a light rub with some 0000 wire wool & oil. The stock looks nice and dark and is best left as is IMO.

    The barrel catch not resting in the fully forward position is a good sign and probably indicates minimum wear and a good breech seal. If you don’t want to take it apart a few drops of neatsfoot oil down the transfer port will lubricate the piston a bit.

    It does have the extremely awkward sear adjustment where you can only adjust it when the gun is cocked (!?!) but I disconnect the end cap then you can cock it under no spring tension and adjust the trigger sear more easily.

    I have been doing this on my scruffy peepsight ‘supertarget’ version for about six months on and off, turning the screw in a millimetre at a time and then testing down the range till it finally got light enough to be very accurate, then secured it with threadlock.
    EXTREME CAUTION if you set it too light it goes off while you’re cocking it and that is absolutely terrifying.
    I milled the sear flat for maximum surface engagement, increased the sear spring preload accordingly and adjusted the sear screw in millimetre by millimetre to be safe.
    If it feels ok as it is I’d leave it alone.

    Well done, I doubt you could find another Britannia that’s had as little use.

    Cheers,
    Matt

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •