Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 24

Thread: Is a ProSport a copy of a Venom Mach 2?

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Leighton Buzzard/London
    Posts
    1,581

    Is a ProSport a copy of a Venom Mach 2?

    This topic has been covered here a few times, but with no back up, only opinions of various people, some calling themselves experts. I am no expert, but I had access to a few pictures, and I can use a calendar to reference some dates.

    This was previously covered in the following threads:

    http://www.airgunbbs.com/showthread....a-Venom-Mach-2
    https://www.airgunbbs.com/showthread...-Trigger-Units

    Well, the ProSport has been called the nicest looking production spring airgun of all time, it was designed by Ken Turner, however many like to claim that it was a copy of the Venom Mach 2 design…

    I thought I post here, as I have posted on another forum with some pictures and dates to back this up, also what prompted me was a post by Professor Mike Wright (RIP), who used to write springer articles with Jim Tyler BTDT on here, and lets say he knew a thing or 2 about spring guns and their history:

    'History does get distorted over time, but rarely totally inverted', Arthur Miller
    'All the right notes, but not necessarily in the right order' , Eric Morecambe


    Back to the topic, Ken Turner made his own concealed underlever in 1982, named it the KT82 as shown below (the number, after KT indicates year of production):





    Some of its features, including delrin pegs (Lazaglide, yes, Lazaglide!) are described in this article below (so who invented the Lazaglide and when? &#128521:



    This of course is the prototype of the ProSport, that many would like to think is a copy of the Mach 2, however, I don't think Venom made any gun in 1982, let alone a Mach 2? In fact, I think they only started work in 1981 as Venom Conversions, Trapshot, Lye, working purely on tuning Weihrauchs, not making any guns of their own. The Mach 2 didn’t appear until 1989, so this prototype predates the Mach 2 by 7 years. I believe that Ken Turner did work with Venom in the early years and did a lot of machining for them as he was an expert machinist, I guess the Venom team didn't machine their own parts, as why send machining to the South of UK with Venom being based in the Midlands? Was it cheaper? Like sending stuff to India or China now? I don’t think so.

    Now while we are on this subject, let’s look at the famous Venom Mach 1. Again, Ken Turner made his prototype in 1985, named it the KT85. Note the under-barrel catch like on the Mach 1. The Mach 1 appeared in 1987 I believe, so the KT85 predated it by 2 years.





    Most of Ken Turner’s guns are 'in the white' as they were made from stainless steel, which of course doesn't rust easily, but is very difficult to machine, compared to mild steel. I remember asking Shaun from ISP about making a gun out of Stainless, he said he did it once and will never do it again, as it was too difficult to machine!

    Ken Turner was a quiet man, his work wasn’t advertised much and he and didn’t get the recognition he deserved in the airgun world, unlike others who claimed they have invented everything.

    What I also thought was interesting, is that when Ken Turner and Venom team parted company, around 1989 (I believe, as I don’t know this for sure) the Mach 1, Mach 2 and Mach 1 trigger unit production has stopped. Surely, Venom could make them themselves, or find another competent machine shop, or could they? Many will say that the guns were too expensive to manufacture etc etc but I believe that unfinished rifles exist, but there is no one to finish them. Considering these guns sell for crazy amounts of money, it would have made sense to get them finished and sold.

    So, is a ProSport a copy of a Venom Mach 2? I guess it is, as both were made and designed by Ken Turner.

  2. #2
    Murphy is offline Cooee! Chase me you naughty boys!
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Wigan
    Posts
    22,390
    Or did they all copy the Airsporter.
    Master Debater

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Leighton Buzzard/London
    Posts
    1,581
    Quote Originally Posted by Murphy View Post
    Or did they all copy the Airsporter.
    Very fair point! But ProSport being a copy of the Mach 2 sounds so much better

    If you look at the article, Ken Turner talks about conical piston head which if course is a feature on the AirSporter

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Dudley
    Posts
    9,308
    Not this old chestnut again!!! If you join the venom facebook page you may get your answer direct from the horses mouth by asking Ivan himself as he does have a look in now and again and have a giggle about all the BS surrounding his and Dave's stuff. Mach 1.5
    Last edited by Mach 1.5; 26-05-2023 at 11:46 AM.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Leighton Buzzard/London
    Posts
    1,581
    Quote Originally Posted by Mach 1.5 View Post
    Not this old chestnut again!!! If you join the venom facebook page you may get your answer direct from the horses mouth by asking Ivan himself as he does have a look in now and again and have a giggle about all the BS surrounding his and Dave's stuff. Mach 1.5
    I don't do FB, also it would be very one sided as Ken and Dave are no longer with us. I have also heard that Ivan doesn't like it when Ken's name gets mentioned

    The evidence speaks for itself I think, as otherwise it's only words, hang on, that's the Bee Gees, or did I just invent that

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    City of London
    Posts
    9,767
    The Mach 2 underlever looks very like the Pro Sport's, so there must have been inspiration taken at very least, if not outright copying.
    Vintage Airguns Gallery
    ..Above link posted with permission from Gareth W-B
    In British slang an anorak is a person who has a very strong interest in niche subjects.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Dorset
    Posts
    2,871
    Quote Originally Posted by Mach 1.5 View Post
    Not this old chestnut again!!! If you join the venom facebook page you may get your answer direct from the horses mouth by asking Ivan himself as he does have a look in now and again and have a giggle about all the BS surrounding his and Dave's stuff. Mach 1.5
    What is the title of the Venom FB page Mach ? All I get when I put the Venom name in a search, is a heavy metal band
    Hw77+7

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Dudley
    Posts
    9,308

    Venom.

    Venom Arms - VMach Facebook I think it is. Just looking at my paper work. I see Ivan went to D J Bennett Engineering where KT was employed in Sept 85 with there prototype work of the Mach 1. Early 86 Bennett & Turner visited venom to discuss various aspests of design etc. I'm surprised KT didn't kick up a fuss and say, you've copied my rifle!!! Mach 1.5
    Last edited by Mach 1.5; 26-05-2023 at 04:16 PM.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Location
    worcester
    Posts
    891

    venom

    Quote Originally Posted by HW777 View Post
    What is the title of the Venom FB page Mach ? All I get when I put the Venom name in a search, is a heavy metal band
    Hear you go https://www.facebook.com/groups/514984415696511

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Leighton Buzzard/London
    Posts
    1,581
    Quote Originally Posted by Mach 1.5 View Post
    Not this old chestnut again!!! If you join the venom facebook page you may get your answer direct from the horses mouth by asking Ivan himself as he does have a look in now and again and have a giggle about all the BS surrounding his and Dave's stuff. Mach 1.5
    I have been informed by a mate who is on facebook that someone has copied my post from here and placed it on that page you mention, let's see what it yields, I am not holding my breath though

    In the meantime I did find an interesting post by RustyBuzz (Richard Welham of Airmasters) in this topic:

    https://www.airgunbbs.com/showthread...43#post7215743

    Quote Originally Posted by RustyBuzz View Post
    Pre Ken Turner Venom tune on a 77 was debur new spring and good lubrication. Piston was left without a sleeve. If it's not a laserglide and you want it to be authentic that's all it takes.
    I am not sure if anyone would actually admit that they have used someone else's ideas and made a successful business out of it. Don't get me wrong, I admire the Venom business model, great advertising and a good unique product, they have created almost a cult following in our small airgun world... I believe that Ivan was actually in charge of sales and advertising, so all credit to him in that respect.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Leighton Buzzard/London
    Posts
    1,581
    The forum is very quiet and some more information is coming out of the woodwork, so here is another article from June 1987 Airgun World, stating that at one point Ivan Hancock and Ken Turner were old friends and that Ken Turner provided some solutions for the famous Venom Mach 1 airgun:



    [Click on image to enlarge it]

    Also, the 'screw together pivot pins' mentioned in the article, were used on Ken's own gun, the KT83 built in 1983, obviously before any Mach 1. This was confirmed by the current owner of the KT83. (Some pictures of the KT83 rifle, here: https://forum.vintageairgunsgallery....rner-ken/kt83/ for those that are interested.)

    So there you have it...

    I am still waiting for any evidence that it was actually the other way around, and that in fact it was Venom that provided the ideas to Ken, as you can't apparently trust the airgun mags, but word of mouth is ok

    Well I shall not be holding my breath on this one
    Last edited by nurek; 31-07-2023 at 09:34 PM.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Dudley
    Posts
    9,308
    . I believe that Mr Hancock still has several unfinished triggers and Mach 2 actions, they could be finished and sold on for a lot money..

    In answer to your question above. Ivan is now 77 and in not great health and doesn't have the time or money to finish off or get parts made for the last few..it's only cylinders and barrel shrouds all the other parts would need making. Sometimes it not all about making money.

    We could reverse the question though, why didn't Venom (especially when backed by Webley money in 2000s) didn't kick up a fuss or sue Air Arms for copying their design?

    Again In answer to your question. An Amercian gentleman had his lawyers draw up all the legal papers ready to sue over the pro sport design but action was dropped in 96 due to the awful & tragic dunblane incident. And yes I did see the paperwork and not read it in a magazine.
    You would know this information as I've already told you on a few occasions. If you need anymore answers to your questions just send me a pm or text and I'll answer them.

    Mach 1.5
    Last edited by Mach 1.5; 27-05-2023 at 08:52 AM.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Halesowen
    Posts
    260

    Gun barrel

    What year did venom arms start working and selling rifle out of the gun barrel i purchased HW 35 Export from there im sure id just left school .

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Halesworth
    Posts
    413
    Quote Originally Posted by bandit2329 View Post
    What year did venom arms start working and selling rifle out of the gun barrel i purchased HW 35 Export from there im sure id just left school .
    As previously posted by Mach1.5

    Venom Conversions -Trapshot - Lye - 1981 - March 1984

    Venom Arms Company - Gun Barrel Works - Cradley Heath.
    24th March 1984 - 1995

    Venomac Ltd. - Mucklow Hill - Halesowen.
    1st August 1995 - September 1998

    Webley Venom Custom Shop - Frankly Ind. Est.
    October 1998 - 23rd December 2005

    V-Mach - Stourbridge
    10th April 2006 to 26th November 2020

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Dorset
    Posts
    2,871
    Quote Originally Posted by Mach 1.5 View Post
    . I believe that Mr Hancock still has several unfinished triggers and Mach 2 actions, they could be finished and sold on for a lot money..

    Ivan is now 77 and in not great health and doesn't have the time or money to finish off or get parts made for the last few..it's only cylinders and barrel shrouds all the other parts would need making. Sometimes it not all about making money.

    Mach 1.5
    For out n out custom specials, a collaboration with Ivan and ISP would bring into being some very fine rifles

    I don't have the deep pockets to fund this idea but there's bound to be some who want the last ever Venom rifles where money isn't an issue.
    Hw77+7

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •