Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 31 to 37 of 37

Thread: Webley Tomahawk heavy recoil

  1. #31
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Near Wimbledon, SW London, or Lusaka, Zambia
    Posts
    26,797
    pistons shouldn't slide down on their own.. they should need a few pounds of force minimum.if you can shove it in with one finger, it'll be fine.
    Last edited by Shed tuner; 10-09-2024 at 06:16 AM.
    Always looking for any cheap, interesting, knackered "project" guns. Thanks, JB.

  2. #32
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Rossendale, Lancashire
    Posts
    1,245
    Thanks shed tuner. I think it does need sizing a little as it takes a fair bit of force to push the piston down and the power is down to 10ft/lb. It did feel to have a little less recoil, but still way too much, so I am going to give the transfer port a go. Do I need to use a pillar drill, or will a battery driver be ok? I got a 2.90mm long series cobalt drill bit and a 3mm twisted hand reamer.

  3. #33
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Near Wimbledon, SW London, or Lusaka, Zambia
    Posts
    26,797
    just noticed my typo.. but I'm sure from the rest of the line you got the message ! Yes, if it needs a good shove, then a little sizing makes sense... However, make sure you size it so it's still too stiff... reason being freshly sized seals wear in very quickly, so if you size to perfection, it'll be too loose within 50 shots. Also, tighter seals do generally dampen recoil a bit, so you probably want it on the tight side anyways.

    As you are going to hand ream the final cut (which is definitely the best approach), hand held drill is just fine - and probably less awkward than trying to get that under a pillar drill ! just make sure it's as true as possible, checking from multiple angles.. and go very steady - low force, low speed

    When you are reaming, you don't need any significant force shoving it in, just turn it and let it feed with gravity
    Last edited by Shed tuner; 10-09-2024 at 06:28 AM.
    Always looking for any cheap, interesting, knackered "project" guns. Thanks, JB.

  4. #34
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Rossendale, Lancashire
    Posts
    1,245
    I drilled and reamed the transfer port to 3mm today and WOW what a difference. Its still got a bit of kick to it, but its definitely a lot better and more of a snappy nudge backwards. I'm almost tempted to go to 3.1-3.2, but think I'll let it run in and see what the accuracy is like.

    I would love to get the piston lightened and glided at some point if anyone knows someone that can do that sort of work. I gave the piston skirt a light rub with 1200 grit and brushed moly powder into the cylinder where the skirt rubs and it feels smoother, but its still nowhere near the smoothness of my old Sidewinder.

    Thanks for all the help

  5. #35
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Near Wimbledon, SW London, or Lusaka, Zambia
    Posts
    26,797
    Quote Originally Posted by Mark A View Post
    I drilled and reamed the transfer port to 3mm today and WOW what a difference. Its still got a bit of kick to it, but its definitely a lot better and more of a snappy nudge backwards. I'm almost tempted to go to 3.1-3.2, but think I'll let it run in and see what the accuracy is like.

    I would love to get the piston lightened and glided at some point if anyone knows someone that can do that sort of work. I gave the piston skirt a light rub with 1200 grit and brushed moly powder into the cylinder where the skirt rubs and it feels smoother, but its still nowhere near the smoothness of my old Sidewinder.

    Thanks for all the help
    Good result. Yeah, shoot it a bit with the 3.0 port before you go further... and let the new seal settle in. I do think a little more will help, but it's diminishing returns...
    Always looking for any cheap, interesting, knackered "project" guns. Thanks, JB.

  6. #36
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Retford, Notts
    Posts
    36,666
    Great to hear how well that has worked, Mark.

    Jon, Shed tuner, really knows his stuff and following his recommendations is always a good idea.

    Personally, unless there was excessive clearance between the piston and cylinder, I don't think there's much to gain from gliding. Moly treating is good. Just add a tiny smear of high moly content paste around the rear bearing part of the piston and done. Piston lightening might pay dividends (depends how heavy it is currently), but may then need balancing with the spring used - rate, force, preload etc. - and the gun's pellet preference might alter, too.

    Now you're at a happy place, further mods go into the realms of diminishing returns for extra effort / spend.

    As Jon says, enjoy for now. Let it all settle and see how you and the gun feel in another couple of thousand shots or so.

    For gliding / lightening work, maybe approach NickG on here or Nick Simmons or Paul Short elsewhere if you want to follow that route.
    THE BOINGER BASH AT QUIGLEY HOLLOW. MAKING GREAT MEMORIES SINCE 15th JUNE, 2013.
    NEXT EVENT :- May 2025.........BOING!!

  7. #37
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Dudley
    Posts
    9,673

    Piston

    For someone like Nick Simmons and the others then gliding the piston the Tommy is straight forward as the groove for the front O ring is already present on the short stroke nose. Mach 1.5

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •