Are they easier to shoot than std i find they are had a few from daystates to hw80 even a bsa scorpion is easy to shoot standing whats your thoughts ??????????
Are they easier to shoot than std i find they are had a few from daystates to hw80 even a bsa scorpion is easy to shoot standing whats your thoughts ??????????
double edged sword for me.. they are easier to bring up on aim, and to hold in the shoulder for longer periods - e.g. tracking a tree rat in the branches, waiting for the right shot.. but this ease of movement makes them a bit twitchy and less stable.
So short answer I think easier yes, but at the expense of some stability and precision.
No surprise 10M match rifles have shrouded / thick barrels and barrel weights.
Where you are rested however, and in a confined space (e.g. shooting from a vehicle) the compactness really helps.
Always looking for any cheap, interesting, knackered "project" guns. Thanks, JB.
For most uses, a bad idea. For some, a good idea. It all depends on your needs and likes.
I agree with Jon regarding the stability on unsupported shots.
I really like my Fx Wildcat but find it too light on aim for free hand shooting.
More practice me thinks ldgrin.
Les..
I find conventional rifles easier, but its down to personal preference.
That said, the gun I pick up most is a P15 and its a delight, I also use a 100 BPK with a highly elevated NV unit. Generally with bullpups the high scope position can feel top heavy, cant over easily, and the distance between barrel and scope can be greater than a conventional rifle. Meaning a nice flat pellet curve at the sweet spot, but much correction is needed at short and long ranges.
Bullpup for me unless shooting lots of prone or just sitting at a bench, everything else I find the BP better.
My standing shots are definitely better as Im not waving a broom around and out pesting around the farm and woodland the BP is a bonus, even shooting from a vehicle is easier
But we know we are all different and each to their own
bigtoe, Harry, hydroclamp, jpsnorton, gayle89, mark410, Stu83, smallholder1, wellhouse0, readingcop, sir-slots-alot, danco1987, Stevenb, DarylDiane, simpleSimon, Ratinator, Milek, Josh, Maxtich, Woodsie99, Ozzie, master_shriller, niloc, Drake267, deejayuu, shootingstars
In Theory a bullpup should be more stable in the shoulder, because the short length has less leverage,
it should also be possible to brace your leading arm against your body for better support & less strain, but most shooters still reach forward as they do with a "stocked rifle".
What I hate is having to reach back by your ear to cock the action.
Berated the need for Bullpups till I came across a P15 too cheap to turn down, now shoot little else. Majority of my shooting is from a concealed position and I can manoeuvre a Pup into my shoulder with one hand and with far less chance of catching branches etc. The weight and position does make the gun lively and the best way to counteract this, in my mind, is to have the trigger set as light as safely possible to avoid the slightest movement when firing - works for me. These guns are often criticized for the cocking lever position being under your chin but I can say, hand on heart, that it has never been an issue for me.
i find the bullpup easier to shoulder