Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 37

Thread: March 94 AGW New HW97

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Dudley
    Posts
    10,235

    March 94 AGW New HW97

    Just looking at some old AGW's March 1994 they tested the new HW97 and yes complete with square section spring. I know they fitted them to the MK2 97 but never realised they fitted them to the MK1.
    Mach 1.5

  2. #2
    Hsing-ee's Avatar
    Hsing-ee is offline may also be employed in conjunction with a drawn reciprocation dingle arm, to reduce sinusoidal repleneration
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Glasgow
    Posts
    19,534
    Quote Originally Posted by Mach 1.5 View Post
    Just looking at some old AGW's March 1994 they tested the new HW97 and yes complete with square section spring. I know they fitted them to the MK2 97 but never realised they fitted them to the MK1.
    Mach 1.5
    That must have been the days when Geoffrey Boxall or someone would actually strip the rifle as part of the test .. although seems a bit late.

    What on earth were Weihrauch doing chancing it with the square-secton wire? Apart from the Ox, the only other one is the Merlin that Maccari sells in the US. I don't know the theory behind the square wire thing other than it has more volume of metal for a given diameter of wire, but what is the sense in that? Just makes the spring stiffer, but you could do that by using thicker wire, albeit the spring needing to be a little bit longer than with the square.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Dudley
    Posts
    10,235

    97

    Well it was 30 years ago and I dare say they learnt their lesson by the time the MK3 version came out. Mach 1.5

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Retford, Notts
    Posts
    39,057
    Quote Originally Posted by Mach 1.5 View Post
    Just looking at some old AGW's March 1994 they tested the new HW97 and yes complete with square section spring. I know they fitted them to the MK2 97 but never realised they fitted them to the MK1.
    Mach 1.5
    Every day's a school day, Paul.
    THE BOINGER BASH AT QUIGLEY HOLLOW. MAKING GREAT MEMORIES SINCE 15th JUNE, 2013.
    NEXT EVENT :- May 17/18, 2025.........BOING!!

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Retford, Notts
    Posts
    39,057
    Quote Originally Posted by Hsing-ee View Post
    That must have been the days when Geoffrey Boxall or someone would actually strip the rifle as part of the test .. although seems a bit late.

    What on earth were Weihrauch doing chancing it with the square-secton wire? Apart from the Ox, the only other one is the Merlin that Maccari sells in the US. I don't know the theory behind the square wire thing other than it has more volume of metal for a given diameter of wire, but what is the sense in that? Just makes the spring stiffer, but you could do that by using thicker wire, albeit the spring needing to be a little bit longer than with the square.
    I think there may have been another one (or two?) square section springs, Al? Does "Air Force" spring (BOING.....sic!!!!) to mind?
    THE BOINGER BASH AT QUIGLEY HOLLOW. MAKING GREAT MEMORIES SINCE 15th JUNE, 2013.
    NEXT EVENT :- May 17/18, 2025.........BOING!!

  6. #6
    Hsing-ee's Avatar
    Hsing-ee is offline may also be employed in conjunction with a drawn reciprocation dingle arm, to reduce sinusoidal repleneration
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Glasgow
    Posts
    19,534
    Quote Originally Posted by TonyL View Post
    I think there may have been another one (or two?) square section springs, Al? Does "Air Force" spring (BOING.....sic!!!!) to mind?
    I remember the advert with some delta wing sketch aircraft with RAF roundels although no such plane had ever been in service .. I’ve never heard anyone but one and assumed it was a fake front for money laundering…

    I mean what is the deal with square section springs? Just stiffer per unit length? They can shave metal if poorly finished or too tight a fit but the Maccari one I have is ok, I think I got it for some experiments on up-powering a FWB300… might fit an HW30 as well.


    Merlin XL- Custom Spring- Upgraded Use

    Add to Cart Pay By PayPal
    Orig. Price: $20.00
    Sale Price: $17.00
    Availability: in stock
    Prod. Code: 8787-090

    Fits many guns that require more preload than our smaller springs.

    Square wire, figure it at .116" average, .509 inch ID., 37 coils and 12.2"plus unset.

    Very smooth easy cocking.

    Good for the old Gamo 68-200-300- Repeaters- Diana 27-427-Original

    Can be used in Modern Gamos that take the E3650 spring for a soft tune.

    Can be used and cut for many guns like the Diana 24-25-R7-30's etc. Even as

    a soft tune on the old R9's with the .500 spring guide.

    These are easy to cut and re-close.

    Presetting option allows super easy installation

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Retford, Notts
    Posts
    39,057
    Quote Originally Posted by Hsing-ee View Post
    ....... I don't know the theory behind the square wire thing other than it has more volume of metal for a given diameter of wire, but what is the sense in that? Just makes the spring stiffer, but you could do that by using thicker wire, albeit the spring needing to be a little bit longer than with the square.
    Quote Originally Posted by Hsing-ee View Post

    I mean what is the deal with square section springs? Just stiffer per unit length? They can shave metal if poorly finished or too tight a fit but the Maccari one I have is ok,
    I've never been tempted to fit a square section spring, Al, believing many of those earlier claims to be hype. Yes, I believe their main USP would have been to get more volume of steel in there to give more power / stiffness.

    There have been many disparaging comments in the past going along the lines of, "I wouldn't even fit an Ox to a garden gate, they're that bad" etc. etc., but Mick, T20 (and, no doubt, others) have proved that, as long as they are properly finished, no sharp edges etc., they can be good in many applications. It's just a question of matching the spring force, preload etc., to the intended application.
    THE BOINGER BASH AT QUIGLEY HOLLOW. MAKING GREAT MEMORIES SINCE 15th JUNE, 2013.
    NEXT EVENT :- May 17/18, 2025.........BOING!!

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    gateshead
    Posts
    27,287
    was never keen on the square springs
    you only get one life live it to the best of your ability

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Oslo, Norway
    Posts
    3,048
    Quote Originally Posted by Hsing-ee View Post
    ... I don't know the theory behind the square wire thing other than it has more volume of metal for a given diameter of wire, but what is the sense in that? Just makes the spring stiffer, but you could do that by using thicker wire, albeit the spring needing to be a little bit longer than with the square.
    If you dont have room for a thicker round wire, the square wire puts more steel in the same area.
    But guns with that little room for spring usually dont benefit from stiffer wire in my opinion.
    Too many airguns!

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Barnsley
    Posts
    2,665
    Metal fatigue will always find a corner an easier place to start a crack. Note the dehavilland comet....

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Bruton
    Posts
    6,676
    I thought the 97 was introduced with the square-section spring, and that HW/HC/the magazines presented it as an improvement.

  12. #12
    Hsing-ee's Avatar
    Hsing-ee is offline may also be employed in conjunction with a drawn reciprocation dingle arm, to reduce sinusoidal repleneration
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Glasgow
    Posts
    19,534
    Quote Originally Posted by Geezer View Post
    I thought the 97 was introduced with the square-section spring, and that HW/HC/the magazines presented it as an improvement.
    Apart from the extra stiffness they’re easier to cut and shut maybe it was making Hull Cartridge’s sessions with the bolt cutter a bit less gnarly.

  13. #13
    Murphy is offline Cooee! Chase me you naughty boys!
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Wigan
    Posts
    22,512
    I remember reading that edition on the school bus!
    Master Debater

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Retford, Notts
    Posts
    39,057
    Quote Originally Posted by Hsing-ee View Post
    Apart from the extra stiffness they’re easier to cut and shut maybe it was making Hull Cartridge’s sessions with the bolt cutter a bit less gnarly.
    Lol!
    THE BOINGER BASH AT QUIGLEY HOLLOW. MAKING GREAT MEMORIES SINCE 15th JUNE, 2013.
    NEXT EVENT :- May 17/18, 2025.........BOING!!

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    NR Doncaster
    Posts
    3,322
    An Ox mainspring worked well in my HW35.
    I was given X2 to test in the 35 by Dave before they were on general release.
    No issues and have only recently replaced it....with the other one I had as a spare.
    It was still at nearly 9ftlb
    Fitted Britseals and Hi Moly lube.
    Power back up to 11.6.
    Definitely will outlive me
    Good springs in the right gun.
    Still bit boink etc but shoots well and very accurate.
    "Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote!" -- Benjamin Franklin

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •