hi all
anybody use burris scopes on here
if so which one and are they any good
compared to leupold
neil
hawke sr12 remington bp revolver
tikka t3 lite .223 leopuld 4x14x44 pr
I have a Burris Signature 8-32 RA model and it is extremely bright. It is at least as clear as my Bushnell Elite 4200s but the field of view is much wider. I used to have a Burris Fullfield 2 with a ballistic reticle. the otics were great on that too but it didn't parallax down close enough to my liking.
Lione
Having had an RA burris and sold to get a 4200, i'd agree entirely with the above apart from saying the burris is no brighter but comparable.
The only draw back on the burris is no option of mildot on the RA and they are no where near as robust or light as the titanium built 4200. Mine had to go back for rethreading of the px ring and all of the ra's at the club had been sent back for similar or turret work. All FOC of course under the no-quibble lifetime warranty.
The only problem I can see is that you can't buy a Burris worth having new.
Burris also make excellent hunting scopes for airguns and rimfire- the 3-9 and 4-12x40. Not cheap but bomb proof and with excellent clarity.
Arthur
I wish I was in the land of cotton.
SECOND THAT ARTHUR
i have owned nearly every top end scope on the market and the burris fullfield range at second hand prices cant be beaten for value for money.
expect to pick the fullfield ll range second hand in 3-9x50 or 4.5-14x 42 up for about £140 to £170.
crisp optics bombproof contruction.
got the fullfield 2 4.5x14 ballistic plex on my .223 and it,s excellent,imported new from the states for £194
hi darrell81
where abouts did you import from the states
your burris scope
neil
hawke sr12 remington bp revolver
tikka t3 lite .223 leopuld 4x14x44 pr
I have the Leupy and burris that are in my sig, i have to admit that the Burris has very slightly better optics when used in dawn/dusk lighting. However the Leupy is smoother in operation.... But both are absolutely fantastic scopes. You wont go wrong with either makes.