Latest re: Steyr LP50

[Cocksure]

Its not an edit. It's a direct quote from the Act. You have read the act haven't you?

I did read what you wrote. That wasn't your original point of debate. Your point was they were exempt because they were airguns. They're not exempt. Doesn't matter what they are or are not, what you think it makes them or what it doesn't. They're not exempt.

There's a difference between opinion, qualified opinion and fact. You state that fact is wrong, when it clearly isn't. If that actually had any traction as fact it could be called upon. But it doesn't. It's not even qualfied opinion. That's why the Cocksure defence wouldn't be used. Because it isn't one. Because it's not fact.

Changing what you say because you're stuck doesn't change it, changing your point doesn't either, trying to camoflague it with another argument doesn't either. Saying something is wrong when it isn't doesn't either.


H

Semi auto airguns are Section 5. The thing called an LP50 is considered as such. That's why they've been seized.



Try not to get upset about it. (Unless you've got a s5 airgun).

You're over powered airgun needs a firearm cert because it becomes a firearm when it no longer fits tge description of an airgun.....it's a simple enough point.
It's called debate, people have opinions and most normal people do not consider their
opinions as an order to act.....you know full well what my point is.
And get upset? About some time passing tattle on a web site....no mate, you won't f ind me calling people names 'cause they disagree with me, the law or god. I only start with the name calling in retaliation......you tit.