Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 33

Thread: A question about FFP or SFP Scopes

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jun 2022
    Location
    Basingstoke
    Posts
    29

    A question about FFP or SFP Scopes

    Hi all,
    My question goes out to all shooters with less than perfect eyesight.
    When using a zoom scope, do you favour FFP or SFP optics? After quite a bit of looking and reading, I think I’m favouring FFP so that hold over, under mildot marking will remain valid at all magnifications. That said, I’d like your advice/opinions please.

    Thanks in advance,


    JP
    Last edited by JonnieP; 14-06-2022 at 12:34 PM.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Location
    Melton Mowbray
    Posts
    2,314
    I have found with large magnification scopes, the reticule becomes useless once zoomed out.

    I have a very good 4-12x40 that works well.
    I also have a 4-16 that is OK but only just at low mag.
    Repariere nicht, was nicht kaputtist.

  3. #3
    Jesim1's Avatar
    Jesim1 is offline Likes to wear driving gloves in the bedroom
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    Kilmarnock
    Posts
    4,976
    Quote Originally Posted by Neil54 View Post
    I have found with large magnification scopes, the reticule becomes useless once zoomed out.

    I have a very good 4-12x40 that works well.
    I also have a 4-16 that is OK but only just at low mag.
    I agree with Neil, you will get people liking both types, but if your using a higher mag like a 6-24 for targets/range work, then the reticule at the lower end is useless for it's intent, as at air gun ranges the spacings are so small your can't use them. For that reason I prefer SSP for air guns and anything higher mag, lower mag and for hundreds of yards then they can be a benefit, as you describe, but try to look though one to see what I mean - seeing is believing
    Making a mockery of growing old gracefully since I retired

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Exeter
    Posts
    36,779
    I use both SFP & FFP,
    my issue with SFP is that at lower mag, on the cheaper end scopes, the ret is so thick it obscures a large chunk of the target, I particularly dislike the basic Hawke 30/30, mil dot & 1/2 mil dot for this reason,
    mind you Bushnell mil dot & most N-S rets are even worse to my eyes.

    If you go up to their floating 10x 1/2 mil dot, AMX or the specialist ret's then you do get a nice fine clear usable ret for SFP from Hawke.

    My best scopes are my Optisan EVX 4-16x44 FFP's, I love the FFP ret, the subtent's are perfectly clear, even down at 4x and as you say 1 mil is 1 mil across the whole mag range so if you know the range & projectile drop it's simple,
    No working out how the mag relates to "true".

    But as is said with all 'what scope' threads, everyones eyes are different, what suits one person may not suite another, so Never buy a scope without trying one.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Chelmsford
    Posts
    2,176
    SFP for me as the ret stays the same so its easy to see and use


    Chris
    bigtoe, Harry, hydroclamp, jpsnorton, gayle89, mark410, Stu83, smallholder1, wellhouse0, readingcop, sir-slots-alot, danco1987, Stevenb, DarylDiane, simpleSimon, Ratinator, Milek, Josh, Maxtich, Woodsie99, Ozzie, master_shriller, niloc, Drake267, deejayuu, shootingstars

  6. #6
    harvey_s's Avatar
    harvey_s is offline Lost love child of David Niven and Victoria Beckham
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Norwich
    Posts
    9,428
    If you do have a condition where on some days your vision alters - FFP does offer the real advantage to make the reticle bolder and easier to see.
    But choose your reticle wisely - some try to be too clever and make themselves indistinct at low mags.
    The good ones do not.

    I'm a big fan of the BSA TMD reticle...
    Last edited by harvey_s; 15-06-2022 at 04:21 PM.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Exeter
    Posts
    36,779
    Quote Originally Posted by 32:1 View Post
    SFP for me as the ret stays the same so its easy to see and use


    Chris
    FFP is far easier to use than SFP because the subtents remain in proportion to the target

    You can shoot at any mag, zoom in until you find the POI, note the adjustment to POA in mils, zoom back out to any mag & the adjustment remains the same

    In SFP you need to know what mag you shot, what mag you zoom out to, work out the relation between the two to convert the error, zoom back out to the exact same mag & hope your maths was correct.

    Hardly easy

    There's more to a good scope than just putting the centre cross on the target, and this is where FFP has the advantage.
    Last edited by angrybear; 16-06-2022 at 10:21 AM.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Chelmsford
    Posts
    2,176
    I tend to shoot on x1.5 or x3 mag, ratting and pesting around the farms I need no more, I do shoot BR each Saturday morning and have left my scope at x30 and it never moves, but that is on a specific BR rifle.

    Ive shot for years with fixed scopes and the main one was the venerable 4x40, I have tried a few ffp scopes only to find the rets to busy and cluttered, as Ive just grown up with learning and using holds and find it easy, I suppose I actually prefer fixed scopes.


    Chris
    bigtoe, Harry, hydroclamp, jpsnorton, gayle89, mark410, Stu83, smallholder1, wellhouse0, readingcop, sir-slots-alot, danco1987, Stevenb, DarylDiane, simpleSimon, Ratinator, Milek, Josh, Maxtich, Woodsie99, Ozzie, master_shriller, niloc, Drake267, deejayuu, shootingstars

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Bexhill-On-Sea
    Posts
    5,455
    I tend to just set up a scope and leave alone so it doesn’t really matter
    Looking for TO-6 Trigger unit unmessed with or T0-6 kit for 34

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Chelmsford
    Posts
    2,176
    Quote Originally Posted by PCPShooter View Post
    I tend to just set up a scope and leave alone so it doesn’t really matter
    HFT style
    bigtoe, Harry, hydroclamp, jpsnorton, gayle89, mark410, Stu83, smallholder1, wellhouse0, readingcop, sir-slots-alot, danco1987, Stevenb, DarylDiane, simpleSimon, Ratinator, Milek, Josh, Maxtich, Woodsie99, Ozzie, master_shriller, niloc, Drake267, deejayuu, shootingstars

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Location
    Glasgow
    Posts
    925
    Quote Originally Posted by harvey_s View Post
    I'm a big fan of the BSA TMD reticle...
    Is that Deeley Plaza?

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Location
    Glasgow
    Posts
    925
    I'm with Neil and Jesim. When you try to use FFP at low mag, the reticle is far too fine (at least on the ones I've looked through). Possibly OK against a clear background, but if the background is at all "busy", the reticle is easily lost.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Exeter
    Posts
    36,779
    Well hand on heart I cannot think of a single occasion where that has happened to me, but equally I'll only be using 4x around 20yds, 5x to maybe 25yds, at those ranges there's no issue.
    by the time it gets to 6x the ret is so big it's impossible to lose it.

    And of course simple common sense says, if you can't see the ret at min just turn the mag up until you can, it makes no odds to adjustment because 1 mil will still be 1 mil

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Location
    Glasgow
    Posts
    925
    I think there is a large element of personal preference involved anyway. Oddly enough, my most used scope is a variable Pecar, which is actually FFP - but it has a fairly pronounced German duplex reticle (no. 10) which is massive at 7x - but it works for me.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Chelmsford
    Posts
    2,176
    Quote Originally Posted by bill57 View Post
    I'm with Neil and Jesim. When you try to use FFP at low mag, the reticle is far too fine (at least on the ones I've looked through). Possibly OK against a clear background, but if the background is at all "busy", the reticle is easily lost.
    Agreed, Ive not found a suitable ffp ret yet.
    Perhaps at shooting ranges and paper punching at bigger mags ffp work, but simply hunting or pesting a simple ret and fixed mag work well for me, the ability to be able to point and shoot quickly at various ranges is the key, I dont get time to twidle or focus. Each to their own I guess, be boring all the same



    Chris
    bigtoe, Harry, hydroclamp, jpsnorton, gayle89, mark410, Stu83, smallholder1, wellhouse0, readingcop, sir-slots-alot, danco1987, Stevenb, DarylDiane, simpleSimon, Ratinator, Milek, Josh, Maxtich, Woodsie99, Ozzie, master_shriller, niloc, Drake267, deejayuu, shootingstars

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •