Quote Originally Posted by harvey_s View Post
I'm guessing because he wasn't an employee and will possibly continue to contribute to AGW in the future?
Well I would say he was as close to being an employee as one could be without actually being on the payroll. I believe that when the magazine closed down, he was the only one who had been associated with the magazine right from the beginning (and that includes the owners).
He has also not been invited to contribute to the new 'expanded' Airgunner.