
Originally Posted by
Muskett
This in heaps.
The only thing that matters with sub 12ft/lbs rifles is shot placement.
At these power levels then there is little if no hydraulic trauma effect, so it is the equivalent of delivering .177, .20, .22, and .25 calibre stiletto needles. At the longer ranges the .22 and above can plug in pigeon feathers. Thankfully, non of the usual quarry have thick skin or bone, but the vital areas are small. Which is why shot placement is everything. As .177 generally has higher velocity and flies flatter then most people find hitting small targets at varying distances easier/higher probability.
Unless you just happen to have a nat driving .20 with a pellet that is easy to get, then it is all academic. Just an excuse to have another rifle to play with. Effective range is always what you can hit a polo mint at with a very high probability. A poor shooting .20 might be OK to 20m, and a tack driver out to 35. The limiting factor then is can you match its drop to your range finding? Can you equal that judgement as well as a .177? Most people can't. Most people find .177 hard enough. Most people without a lot of application and practice shouldn't really shoot further than farmyard ranges. I shoot to farmyard ranges as that is my ability with the kind of rifles I enjoy using, and time I put to it all, as all the calibres are easy enough to master with drop and raw accuracy.
Any advantage a .20 has on paper over any other calibre is lost in shot placement probability.