Originally Posted by
angrybear
Given that subsequent events have shown the rifle actually has a recurring intermittent fault,
personally I think it tends to support the sellers position that he sold it in 100% excellent working order,
& as such he was not obliged to give a refund.
I think the firt part of your statement is right, but the I think the big problem with the seller was his unwillingness to persue the warranty claim himself, which as the origininal owner he could easily have done...
But the title of this thread is clearly misleading with what we know now.
Last edited by Shed tuner; 01-02-2022 at 03:03 PM.
Always looking for any cheap, interesting, knackered "project" guns. Thanks, JB.
Reply With Quote