Conman: The ratcatcher

[Rativity]

It’s such a nice little rifle it’s really frustrating it has gone again as all I want to do is take my boy out with it and have some fun shooting

[rapidresponse1]

well lets hope it gets sorted this time

[PCPShooter]

Out of curiosity how's it going with the rifle - ?

[Rativity]

Out of curiosity how's it going with the rifle - ?

Hi
It is due to be picked up again soon by Brocock.
I really want this shooting as it should, it is very capable but something is not right with it?
Fingers crossed hopefully this time ����

[where's it gone]

Any updates ?

[Rativity]

Any updates ?

Hi buddy thanks for your interest

It is still with brocock atm

[rifleman56]

such a shame hope it gets sorted soon,

[Rativity]

such a shame hope it gets sorted soon,

Thank you

[Gary C]

The fella hasn’t replied, he shut the conversation down after NO Refund.

Obviously he’s known something was not right, I did think why he was selling it after only 2 weeks, but that wasn’t the case. It’s 4 months old not 2 weeks! which I was told before I bought it, he then asked for bank tranfer.

Something isn’t right here very suspicious

If the rifle is as good as he says it is then why no to refund? Makes me think it was all planned which is obviously dishonest on his part.

He said it maybe be the scope which I said I’d try another (new scope landed today) which I purchased for this rifle looks like that was a waste of money too.

I’ve heard nothing from him, he hasn’t replied here just total shutdown!

He knew before sending it, he has until tomorrow to get in touch and come up with something to sort this bad deal out then I will have no choice but to contact fraud,
Police and bank which isn’t going to be nice for him..

Police and Bank? You may as well call Ghostbusters and Batman.
This is a civil matter

[rapidresponse1]

your right no one will be interested

[Thamesides]

your right no one will be interested

No you are wrong(I mean airgunners are).We are & hoping for a good outcome for you & your boy

[angrybear]

Given that subsequent events have shown the rifle actually has a recurring intermittent fault,
personally I think it tends to support the sellers position that he sold it in 100% excellent working order,
& as such he was not obliged to give a refund.

[Shed tuner]

Given that subsequent events have shown the rifle actually has a recurring intermittent fault,
personally I think it tends to support the sellers position that he sold it in 100% excellent working order,
& as such he was not obliged to give a refund.

I think the firt part of your statement is right, but the I think the big problem with the seller was his unwillingness to persue the warranty claim himself, which as the origininal owner he could easily have done...

But the title of this thread is clearly misleading with what we know now.

[angrybear]

I think the firt part of your statement is right, but the I think the big problem with the seller was his unwillingness to persue the warranty claim himself, which as the origininal owner he could easily have done...

But the title of this thread is clearly misleading with what we know now.

Yes he could have,
but he might have bought it used himself & so not had any warranty.
Equally if he did have a warranty, why would he take it back with the risk that BSA would reject the claim as caused by misuse, which is clearly what he thought was the case.

I agree about the thread title.

[where's it gone]

I'm watching this thread with interest as Brocock do have some nice airguns, but a watch pot never boils !